Shrink: "That is really all I will say as this really isn't the right place for discussing therapy."

I didn't mean to get too far off topic with a discussion of therapy, but was responding to your quote:

"Bandler coined the term: "psycho the rapist". Meaning Psychotherapists. It didn't have a sexual connotation but refered to the techiniques and methods used by many traditional psychotherapists. These techniques tend to be intrusive and keep the problem in place if not make it worse."

I was interested in discussing this further, as I don't clearly understand your point, but I guess the matter is closed.

Thanks anyway,
Jim

While rape at knifepoint would seem more sinistar the only difference is in the tool used to against the victem.

Allen Bellon, Your early post starts off with a person, this person quickly assumes a female label. Interesting.


If you are smart you can use Hyp to make a person do anything they don't want too do. It requires a Hyptst that knows much about human nature and a fair bit of Hyp.
Once the method is understood the application becomes simple (based on a skilled person) The ease of negation is niaeve in its simplicity, as with all good techniques.

I would also point out. People who don't want to touch spiders (base fear reaction) receive Hyps and can do what they didn't want too a few minutes ago.

But when you realise the spider response is caused by mal interpretation of sensoria and the resulting confusing barrage of cascading nural misinformation, this results in the reactions seen in, and felt by the person we label phobic.

This is the scary thing though, to consider this.
These rapists have studied and are intelligent people, they may have a good profession. and with all this insight they still choose to rape.

What the hell's going on? I've lost the thread completely!!!