On 2009-11-22 11:13, Mike Heitkamper wrote:
Can't wait to see the details so I can decide if it is worth it. Anyone who bought David Regal's Sudden Deck, and Sudden Deck 2.0 knows that a good trick can always be improved upon.

On 2010-01-16 23:31, judgehiker wrote:
I think a lot about the most effective way of using EB so it has some purpose and self effacing humor. I would like to know what you think.
I ask the spectator if I can borrow a 1.00 bill which I am going to attempt to turn into a 20.00 bill. I show the ones (I use four ones) and insert their one dollar bill in the center so it makes five. (Sometimes I even have them put a little x in the upper margin to identify it. When I do the change to twenties there are four twenties with a one dollar bill in the center (with an x on the margin) that didn't change. I announce that it didn't work this time and give them the one dollar that was sandwiched between the twenties. I then put the packet away. This takes care of the problem of doing a trick without a purpose or in not giving the changed money to the spectator. As far as they know they got their dollar back while being totally baffled by the magical change. Judgehiker

On 2010-01-16 23:31, judgehiker wrote:
I think a lot about the most effective way of using EB so it has some purpose and self effacing humor. I would like to know what you think.
I ask the spectator if I can borrow a 1.00 bill which I am going to attempt to turn into a 20.00 bill. I show the ones (I use four ones) and insert their one dollar bill in the center so it makes five. (Sometimes I even have them put a little x in the upper margin to identify it. When I do the change to twenties there are four twenties with a one dollar bill in the center (with an x on the margin) that didn't change. I announce that it didn't work this time and give them the one dollar that was sandwiched between the twenties. I then put the packet away. This takes care of the problem of doing a trick without a purpose or in not giving the changed money to the spectator. As far as they know they got their dollar back while being totally baffled by the magical change. Judgehiker

On 2010-02-01 14:39, Gospel Dan wrote:
I wasn't too excited about a EB 2.0. The original EB works just fine for me, and I can't personally see what an EB 2.0 could add that would justify remarketing it on a whole seperate DVD.

I occasionally receive emails from creator's whose DVD's or ebooks I've purchased with updates on an effect. I believe this is the right way to do it, and not re-marketing with 2.0's. especially only after a year of the first one being released.