(Close Window)
Topic: Kingdom Come Video
Message: Posted by: Steven Youell (Apr 23, 2012 11:14AM)
This item is a small part of the next Monograph. Remember-- this is a SMALL part of it, not the main focus.

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLdr4VIO6pU]Kingdom Come[/url]

SEY
Message: Posted by: mindexplorer (Apr 23, 2012 05:50PM)
That's what I need with my routines! Subtitles!
Message: Posted by: FrenchDrop (Apr 23, 2012 06:46PM)
Looks quite good. If it's not using b***th**s -- and I assume it's not, since the previous thread described it as a new method -- it's definitely intriguing.
Message: Posted by: SpringBizkit (Apr 25, 2012 01:14PM)
Well if this one has a new method.. then that's very intriguing indeed. Cause the first that came to mind are a few.. works.. into the card. There's a few usable but if it's out of the ordinary.. that would definitely be something to see Steven!

By the way, we gotta chat again sometime.. it's just been beyond busy here :/
Message: Posted by: Believing (Apr 25, 2012 06:02PM)
The video is kind of laggy on my computer, but nice work.
Message: Posted by: Vasilis (Apr 26, 2012 04:46AM)
Oh...ok...If you can do this and you aren't an expert in those gambling things (and, of course, the deck is fair), then I'm in awe... Because I'm for years in that gambling subject, and I have no clue how the hell it has be done...I probably have to reconsider many aspects on that matter. Anyway, as famous fellow countryman of me used to say "One thing I'm very sure I know: I don't know anything" (Socrates)...

Vasilis
Message: Posted by: Chris Piercy (Apr 26, 2012 06:41AM)
Looks terrific, if there's no b********s then I'm stumped
Message: Posted by: Kingman (Apr 26, 2012 11:21AM)
Glad you brought it back. Still so anxious to see this offered. Great effect!

Kingman
Message: Posted by: Steven Youell (Apr 26, 2012 11:29AM)
[quote]
On 2012-04-26 07:41, Chris Piercy wrote:
Looks terrific, if there's no b********s then I'm stumped[/quote]
If the word in asterisks can be used to describe an Oxygen exchange, then no-- it doesn't use that.

SEY
Message: Posted by: Breather (Apr 26, 2012 12:58PM)
Nice sequence. Difficult to comment on to an extent, given its not clear if the method is purely technique or whether there has also been some work on the Kings.
Message: Posted by: tomsk192 (Apr 26, 2012 02:13PM)
If Steven is putting this in his next release, it's worth taking a punt. If it's fooling you, it'll fool your audience, and some.
Message: Posted by: MickeyPainless (Apr 26, 2012 02:34PM)
It IS a fooler!

MMc
Message: Posted by: Breather (Apr 26, 2012 02:37PM)
Not exactly fooling, as their are lots of ways to do this. That's not a criticsm of course, just pointing out that it sort of depends on method and for example, extent to which it is impromptu..
Message: Posted by: Steven Youell (Apr 28, 2012 12:43PM)
[quote]
On 2012-04-26 15:37, Breather wrote:
Not exactly fooling, as their are lots of ways to do this. That's not a criticism of course, just pointing out that it sort of depends on method and for example, extent to which it is impromptu..[/quote]
Let me say this: This is one use for the principle. There are more than 100, some of which will be in the Monograph. The method is not appropriate for Card Cheating, but is HIGHLY useful for magicians.

SEY
Message: Posted by: 1tepa1 (Apr 28, 2012 01:56PM)
The question is, how much longer will you make us wait in agony?