|
|
Go to page [Previous] 1~2~3 | ||||||||||
Adrien L. Elite user 479 Posts |
Quote:
On May 7, 2018, kissdadookie wrote: Yes, I should have mentioned that |
|||||||||
252life Inner circle Ninth Circle, Hades 3243 Posts |
Dagnammit curiosity got the better of me.
Just ordered, and hopeful (Great thread folks)
Look for all the world like you're counting the brain cells in his cranium.
-Theodore Annemann |
|||||||||
entermagic Special user 810 Posts |
Please can you post a link in order to purchase it?
|
|||||||||
Adrien L. Elite user 479 Posts |
Quote:
On May 8, 2018, entermagic wrote: http://fraserparker.co.uk/starsign.htm |
|||||||||
252life Inner circle Ninth Circle, Hades 3243 Posts |
I like this, and happy with the purchase
Look for all the world like you're counting the brain cells in his cranium.
-Theodore Annemann |
|||||||||
Rolyan Special user I'm fencing in my land; so far there are 590 Posts |
Quote:
On May 8, 2018, 252life wrote: Could you give a balanced review once you’ve learned and tried it (on ‘normal’ people)? |
|||||||||
252life Inner circle Ninth Circle, Hades 3243 Posts |
Quote:
On May 9, 2018, Rolyan wrote: I sure will try
Look for all the world like you're counting the brain cells in his cranium.
-Theodore Annemann |
|||||||||
Tempesta Elite user USA 404 Posts |
I had originally decided not to purchase this when it released due to previous purchases. However, I decided to pick it up via a discounted price of $10 today from e-mentalism. First off, I don’t know how to review this in-depth as it is so simple, so I will give my honest opinion as politely as possible.
I would be significantly more dissatisfied if I had paid $30 for this. I’m pretty dissatisfied at paying $10. No drama—I genuinely thought it was a joke when I read the method, and smirked, then kept reading and realized it was actually the method. I then watched the performance video to see how this played in real life—and it did not help. As an onlooker—the performance looked confusing and sloppy. The irony is that there is a lot of talk about theatrical statements/phrasing and framing—but the method is totally untheatrical—it breaks the flow, rhythm, and mood for the sake of methodological process. The method requires you to make a mistake and then correct it, and after that, there is still some work to be done to nail it dead on. I’m not trying to be mean, but this essentially boils down to a presentation for making an educated guess. It looks like educated guessing, not psychology, not telepathy, it downplays the reading as educated guessing, it’s possibly a warm up at best to contrast a sure-fire effect right after it and make it seem bigger. I don’t know what to do with this other than sigh. Not for me at all. ||sean ||
//Sean Beard
|
|||||||||
kissdadookie Inner circle 4275 Posts |
Quote:
On Jun 4, 2018, Tempesta wrote: There is a huge cut in the performance/promo video. What's cut out is the readings portion and some of the process. So what you see in the performance/promo video is not accurate to what you are actually doing. The theater and intrigue is in the readings portion of the routine. The readings isn't actually part of the method but it's what dresses up the method and frames it. The method itself is very stripped down and straight forward and if you were to just do the method without having the framing with the readings, then yes, this will not be deceptive at all and whole be very confusing. It's like Seeing Stars, if you were to do Seeing Stars and remove readings from it, that would be a terrible method and confusing and very boring. It would feel like random guessing and just total confusion. |
|||||||||
Tempesta Elite user USA 404 Posts |
Quote:
On Jun 4, 2018, kissdadookie wrote: The video I watched was linked in the pdf, uncut, start to finish, and included a minimal reading—and it was a long time before anything really happened.
//Sean Beard
|
|||||||||
kissdadookie Inner circle 4275 Posts |
Quote:
On Jun 4, 2018, Tempesta wrote: Ahhhhhhh. I don't think I bothered watching that one. LoL. I've just watched the promos he posted on FB. I did use Seeing Stars for a little bit when that came out so know how that one plays IRL. This new one is basically a progression and more streamlined version of that IMO. Used it a handful of times and it does play well. I went back to the good ole a-grams though because that's still more preferred and most direct method. Piggybacking from DiD2 from Peter is something I've more recently been playing around with as a method of doing star sign divinations. I've been playing with a what is a combination of Seeing Stars presentation with the piggybacking technique. |
|||||||||
252life Inner circle Ninth Circle, Hades 3243 Posts |
At times I’ve been pretty harsh on Frazier’s releases.
But, I’m actually pleased with having this in the wheelhouse. This “compromise” really isn’t a thing imo (at least with how I usually present) Here’s a take away some may appreciate; if nothing else, you’ll know your star signs literally backwards and forwards. I still fall back on tried and true a-grams, but this appears to have a place in conversational reading-ish situations. Part of me feels like bashing it, just based on my frustration over a few other purchases, but that would be misguided and false I’m glad for this purchase at the end of the day.
Look for all the world like you're counting the brain cells in his cranium.
-Theodore Annemann |
|||||||||
kissdadookie Inner circle 4275 Posts |
Just to clarify, I do have this new version and have used it a handful of times just to try it out. I did however completely forget to ever watch the video linked in the book. LoL.
|
|||||||||
mindguru Veteran user 320 Posts |
As I am a bit obsessed with these type of effects, I couldn’t resist.
There was some good thinking, but this wasn’t for me. The review by Tempesta, was on point as far as I’m concerned. |
|||||||||
TheDBK Regular user 112 Posts |
Wait, where is the video? I haven’t read this in some time but I don’t remember there being a video?
Thanks, K |
|||||||||
Max Hazy Special user 543 Posts |
Quote:
On Apr 29, 2018, Last Laugh wrote: I second that. A Rose by Any Other Name was one of the two worst purchases I've ever made in my life (Strange Oblique was the other one). It's so similar to Ouija that I couldn't believe they were sold separately. I've heard Fraser is a nice guy... but his reputation was ruined to me after that. PS: By the way... this might be useful for those interested: Operation Gemini by Red Devil meet all of the criteria here AND the participant don't have to say a single word... PLUS it can be used to divine a lot of other things beyond star signs. Think of a card... it will be divined, 100% precision, full propless and the participant don't say a single word. It could be marketed as the ultimate best ever propless overpowered telepathy divination system ever devised in the world... but unfortunately it was simply called Operation Gemini.
"Your method is in my opinion the very best way to do Q&A"
Millard Longman "Max has pushed some less known and seldom used principles a huge step forward" Jan Forster Arcane Grimoires Vol 1- http://www.maxhazy.com/arcane-grimoires/apocryphal-reach/ Arcane Grimoires Vol 2- http://www.maxhazy.com/Codex-Mentis/ |
|||||||||
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Latest and Greatest? » » Fraser Parker New Star Sign Divination! (34 Likes) | ||||||||||
Go to page [Previous] 1~2~3 |
[ Top of Page ] |
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2024 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.06 seconds requiring 5 database queries. |
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < |