

Go to page 1~2 [Next]  
Nir Dahan Inner circle Munich, Germany 1390 Posts 
A guy (which will will call the "organizer") gathers 100 people for a game.
1  Each person is being sent to a room with a computer. The rooms are completely isolated from one another and the only communication available is through the computer to the organizer alone. No communication whatsoever between the people after the game starts. 2  The Organizer then runs a totally random number generator and assigns a number from 1 to 100 for each of the 100 participants. A number may repeat itself. i.e. John can get the number 32 and Jane can also be assigned 32. This number is being saved on the organizer's machine and he is the only one who can access it. 3  An email is then being sent from the organizer to each of the participants. Each email contains a list of the 99 numbers all the OTHER participants have been assigned to (in random order). this email is missing the number assigned to the receipient!!! so all in all 100 emails are being sent with 100 different lists containing each 99 numbers. 4  each person is then asked to send an email back to the organizer with the number he THINKS he was assigned. this number is obviously between 1 and 100. 5  the organizer then collects the answers and compares them to the original numbers assigned to them. if at least ONE is right the entire group gets 1 million dollars. THE 100 PEOPLE ARE ALLOWED TO MEET BEFORE THE GAME STARTS TO DECIDE UPON A STRATEGY.  is there a strategy that guarentees a sure win? if so what is it? if not prove it. this is a wonderful little puzzle I hope you guys enjoy it the same as I did. Nir 

Mehtas Inner circle England, UK 1650 Posts 
Let me get this right
I as a participants receive an email containing a list of 99 numbers from 1 to 100. the missing number is the one that I have been assigned. Right ?? Then I don't see any problem in guessing the right number I was assigned. 

Stephen Buxton Veteran user 311 Posts 
NOt really, as there could be repeats. As each number is not dependant on the others, it is possible that all 100 numbers are the same number. Unlikely, but nevertheless possible
If you put an infinite number of apes in front of an infinite number of computers, you get a pretty good idea of what internet chat rooms can be like


Mehtas Inner circle England, UK 1650 Posts 
The strategy I guess would be this....
I as one of those participants will gather email adrs and log in passwords of all 100 participants. When I get my list of 99 numbers through email, I will look for repeating numbers from the list of 99 numbers. if I find a repeating number (eg No 28). so if there are two figures of 28, I will email back the same number from all 100 email accounts. Im not sure if that guarentees a win but its possible. :kewl: 

Stephen Buxton Veteran user 311 Posts 
I've been pondering this with my Fatherinlaw, and we've come up with a possible strategy... I doubt that there is any strategy that will allow a certain win, due to the nondependancy of the randomness of assigning numbers (is that a proper sentence?), however, it might be possible to improve your odds.
Are you familiar with the birthday probablilty? If you get 25 people chosen at random, the chances are roughly 50/50 that two people will share the same birthday. So, if you have 100 people with 100 numbers chosen at random, the probability moves far closer to certainty that there are two people with the same number. In fact, my gut feeling is that there will be a lot of pairs. So, what each person should do is cross off the pairs in their list (if there are three identical numbers, still only cross off two), and look to see what numbers remain (there will be at least one number remaining). The person can then choose one of those numbers, and email that. I suppose an additional strategy could be to assign people in groups of ten to each of the ten ranges: 1 to 10, 11 to 20 through to 91 to 100. Given a choice of unpaired numbers, they should select a single number within their assigned range. If there is no unpaired number in their range, they can choose any of the others at random as their choice.
If you put an infinite number of apes in front of an infinite number of computers, you get a pretty good idea of what internet chat rooms can be like


stanalger Special user St. Louis, MO 996 Posts 
No guarantee of a win...so the object is to maximize the odds of winning.
If two (or more) people are assigned the same number, then they will receive the same list of 99 numbers. The only way of improving the odds of winning is to devise a scheme in which folks who receive the same list of 99 numbers are sure to submit DIFFERENT numbers as guesses. Here's one way: Number 100 slips of paper, each with a different number from 1 to 100. Before retreating to their individual rooms, each participant draws a slip. Each participant then goes to his/her own room, receives the list of 99 numbers, adds those 99 numbers PLUS the number on their slip of paper. Each reduces the total mod 100, adds 1, and submits THAT number as their guess. I can't imagine a strategy that would increase the odds any better than this. Stan Alger 

stanalger Special user St. Louis, MO 996 Posts 
Ooooops! I haven't solved the original challenge.
We must PROVE that there is no strategy which guarantees a win. 

Nir Dahan Inner circle Munich, Germany 1390 Posts 
Hi all,
as I stated before there is no communication whatsoever between the people after entering the rooms. they cant track other's email addresses or anything like that. they get 99 numbers and have to send a number back. that is all. it seems like all of you are wrong so far. there is a strategy to insure a win  100% of the time. I know it sounds strange but this is the beauty of the problem. here is a strategy that works for two people and the numbers 1 and 2. the first person sends back what he gets. the second person sends the complimentary of what he gets. lets test a sample case: first person gets "1", second person gets "2"  the first person answers "2" (that is what he got) the second answers "2" (he got "1" therefore answers "2") here are all the cases summerized in a table: gettting answering who is correct  "1" , "2" "2" , "2" second "1" , "1" "1" , "2" first "2" , "1" "1" , "1" second "2" , "2" "2" , "1" first  as can be seen from the table, whenever the received numbers are identical the first person gets it right, otherwise the second.  these are two major hints for the solution 1  there is a possible 100% solution 2  I gave you the simplest case solution for 2 people enjoy, nir 

stanalger Special user St. Louis, MO 996 Posts 
Nir,
Interesting. Your strategy for two people agrees with my strategy. Player one adds one to the other player's number, reduces the total mod 2, adds one, and gives that final total as his/her guess. Player two adds two to the other player's number, reduces the total mod 2, adds one, and gives that final total as his/her guess. (Your rules are simpler, but equivalent.) However, my strategy does not guarantee a win for the team in the three person game. I still can't see a winning strategy for three people. But I trust you're correct, so I'll keep working on it. Stan 

Nir Dahan Inner circle Munich, Germany 1390 Posts 
Quote:
On 20050731 20:34, stanalger wrote: Stan, I actually found another algorithm yesterday that GIVEN A SOLUTION guarentees a win. the problem with this one is that you have to prove a solution exists. in any case it is by far less elegant than the first algorithm I have found which also shows there is always a 100% solution and is very very simple compared to the second one, and what makes it elegant and beautiful as well. Nir 

TomasB Inner circle Sweden 1143 Posts 
Thanks for yet another excellent problem, Nir.
/Tomas 

stanalger Special user St. Louis, MO 996 Posts 
Aha! I woke this morning with a solution in my head.
The participants number themselves 099, each getting a different number. So each player has a different groupassigned number. Participants retreat to their rooms and the organizer assigns a number between 1 and 100 to each of them. (Not necessarily different.) Since the total of the 100 organizerassigned numbers must reduce mod 100 to a number between 0 and 99, each player adds the values of the other players' organizerassigned numbers and subtracts this total from their groupassigned number. All of this arithmetic is done mod 100. The player who gets an answer of 0 from the final subtraction submits 100 as his/her guess. All other players simply submit the result of the final subtraction as his/her guess. EXACTLY ONE of the 100 guesses will be correct. The group will be guaranteed a win if they follow this strategy. Yes, Nir, this is a great problem! Very nice! 

Sapient Regular user 126 Posts 
Stan,
Could you explain to my poor brain what you mean by "mod"? I'm asking on its behalf, as it is still asleep, and unavaliable to post messages at the moment. 

stanalger Special user St. Louis, MO 996 Posts 
I just realized that my first posted strategy (which didn't
GUARANTEE a win for the team) can be "tweaked" to get a strategy which DOES guarantee a win for the team. Here's my earlier posted strategy: Quote:
Number 100 slips of paper, each with a different number Change the last sentence to "Each reduces the total mod 100, subtracts that answer from 100, and posts the difference as their guess." Sapient, to answer your question: A positive number mod 100 is simply the last two digits of the number. 234 mod 100 is 34. 394857 mod 100 is 57. 8383747 mod 100 is 47. 27 mod 100 is 27. 3 mod 100 is 3. 200 mod 100 is 0. But a negative number mod 100 is 100 minus the last two digits. (Unless the result is a three digit number, i.e. 100. In the case you say the number mod 100 is 0.) (2 mod 100) is (100  2) or 98 (6453 mod 100) is (100 53) or 47. (6467500 mod 100) is 0 (since (10000) = 100.) Let me post an easier to follow solution that doesn't involve subtraction. 

Nir Dahan Inner circle Munich, Germany 1390 Posts 
Very good Stan,
to you it came in a dream  to me during a boring meeting at work... my strategy to the solution was practically identical, i.e. guarentee that the sum of all the numbers a person sees + the number he sends = a constant number distributed to him from 1100 (no two same numbers can be distributed). This is exactly like saying "substruct .... " Nir p.s. Maybe you can also share with us some of your puzzles Stan? p.p.s. I have tons more (I collect them) but I have to translate them from hebrew (my native tongue  therefore the poor phrasing sometimes) 

Sapient Regular user 126 Posts 
Thanks Stan. That all makes sense now. My brain would thank you, but it isn't here right now. Come to think of it, I haven't seen it in a long, long time.


stanalger Special user St. Louis, MO 996 Posts 
Okay, here's the streamlined strategy. It's easy for all
players to follow, even if they don't understand modular arithmetic. (They may not understand why this strategy works, but they can easily follow the strategy.) A subtraction is still involved, but it's good old "regular" subtraction of the type we learned early in grade school...before we were taught the concept of negative numbers. The players number themselves 1100, each player getting a different number. Call these numbers their group assigned numbers. Once a player receives his/her list of the other 99 players' organizerassigned numbers, the player adds these 99 numbers PLUS the player's own groupassigned number. The player ignores all but the last two digits of this sum. This two digit number (00, 01, 02,..., or 99) is subtracted from 100 and the result is submitted to the organizer. Exactly one player will submit a correct guess. 

MPHanson New user 17 Posts 
(1) I don't understand modular arithmetic.
(2) Based on that beautifully clear "streamlined" method, I can easily follow the strategy. (3) I don't understand why the strategy works. So are you a mentalist, stanalger?  'cuz you read my mind.... Anyway, I tried to do this with 5 players, to get a handle on why it works, but that confused me more (players 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; numbers assigned = 4, 5, 2, 5, 1; addition totals for players = 14, 14, 18, 16, 21; then what???). All that notwithstanding, this strikes me intuitively (that's about all I've got) as a really cool puzzle  thanks Nir Dahan!!! Mike 

MPHanson New user 17 Posts 
(1) I don't understand modular arithmetic.
(2) Based on that beautifully clear "streamlined" method, I can easily follow the strategy. (3) I don't understand why the strategy works. So are you a mentalist, stanalger?  'cuz you read my mind.... Anyway, I tried to do this with 5 players, to get a handle on why it works, but that confused me more (players 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; numbers assigned = 4, 5, 2, 5, 1; addition totals for players = 14, 14, 18, 16, 21; then what???). All that notwithstanding, this strikes me intuitively (that's about all I've got) as a really cool puzzle  thanks Nir Dahan!!! Mike 

TomasB Inner circle Sweden 1143 Posts 
Mike,
The streamlined method works with the easy wording of "The player ignores all but the last two digits of this sum" only because there is 100 people playing. I'm not sure they need to do the final subtraction from 100 in what Stan submitted. I think they can send in the last two digits immediately. In your case you number the people 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 accordingly and add these position numbers to their totals and they will get 14, 15, 20, 19 and 25. Instead of looking at the last two digits as the case with 100 players was you have to divide with 5 and just look at the reminder. They will get 4, 0, 0, 4, 0 where 0, as said before, means that they send in 5 as their answer. The first guy will get it correctly. Following exactly what Stan said you should subtract these answers from 5 and you will get 1, 5, 5, 1, 5 so the second guy is the winner then. Great work, by the way, Stan! /Tomas 

The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Puzzle me this... » » 1..100 an interesting puzzle (0 Likes)  
Go to page 1~2 [Next] 
[ Top of Page ] 
All content & postings Copyright © 20012019 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.24 seconds requiring 5 database queries. 
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < 