

Go to page 1~2~3 [Next]  
PROINWA1 New user Washington USA 7 Posts 
Hello!
Could someone please direct me to a book or video on memorizing a deck? Thanks, 

Stefan S. Loyal user 235 Posts 
Simon Aronson books!
Check out his website: http://www.simonaronson.com/flashed.htm Greetings from Germany Stefan 

antonuccio Regular user Italy 130 Posts 
"Six Hour Memorized Deck" by Martin Joyal. For some good applications, be sure you check the "Workers" series by Mike Close.
Regards 

Denis Behr Special user Germany 686 Posts 
Actually only Volume 5 of the "Workers" Series might prove interesting concerning memorized deck work.
While Aronson's books are fantastic, a lot of his memorized deck routines are challenge locations that destroy the deck in the course of the trick (at least in his first three large books) while Close's work preserves the stack. If you speak Spanish... dare I suggest the great books by Juan Tamariz! If you need a really thorough list of literature with work on the memorized deck check out: joyalstack.com Greetings, Denis 

Burt Yaroch Inner circle Dallas,TX 1097 Posts 
Tamariz's stuff is also on his Lessons in Magic series as well as a sampling on one of the A1 All Stars vids.
And my Spanish is pretty poor but I was able to get through his books. And, yes, they are amazing. There are also several great threads here with tips on learning a memorized deck, just try your search function. Here's my recent favorite system: http://members.aol.com/beagenius/card2.html
Yakworld.


PROINWA1 New user Washington USA 7 Posts 
Thanks to all on my question about the memorized deck. 6 answers in one night! I think I'll investigate Close's workers books first. I have all Close's videos and like his approach to magic. Thanks again!


Law New user 94 Posts 
FYI  Workers vol. 5 won't teach you how to go about memorizing a stack. If memory serves, there is an essay on working with a memorized deck and several effects taught utilizing a stack. I believe Mr. Close uses (or used to use) the Aronson stack, but you won't learn the stack from Workers.


Rodney Massey Loyal user pickering, ontario 231 Posts 
In my opinion, the best source for learning how to properly memorize a deck is "The Memory Book" by Harry Lorayne.


MikeM Regular user United Kingdom 110 Posts 
There was a trick put out by Repro Magic in the UK called "Imagine". He may still have it in stock.
It used the Bart Harding system which is easier to memorise. If this is not available search the Net for the Bart Harding System  it's quite good. The Aronson book "Bound to Please" contains a memorised deck system which is more complex to remember and is a variation of the Nikola System contained in Hugard & Braue's "Encyclopaedia of Card Magic". The Aronson system does have advantages over Nikola if you're into gambling routines. MikeM 

gadola New user 1 Post 
There is a section in the book '13 Steps to Mentalism' by Corinda covering memorized decks and a technique of remembering them.
In addition, you can find complete coverage on the Nikola Card System in 'Encyclopedia of Card Tricks' by Jean Hugard. 

Greg Arce Inner circle 6508 Posts 
My vote is for the Six Hour Deck. It gets the job done and it can be learned in that amount of time. You can apply it to most memorized deck effects. I use it constantly.
Greg
One of my favorite quotes: "A critic is a legless man who teaches running."


ddyment Inner circle Gibsons, BC, Canada 2297 Posts 
Even faster than the Six Hour Deck are the Bart Harding stack, the Charles Gauci stack, and my own "QuickStack", each of which can comfortably be learned in a half hour.
The upside of these stacks (including Joyal's) is their ease of learning, and the fact that they still "work" (albeit a bit more slowly) if you temporarily forget the card/position. The downside is that  because they use algorithms/rules to relate cards and positions  they don't have any "builtin" effects (such as poker deals, etc.). Personally, I think that a memorized deck can be used for much stronger effects than poker deals! ... Doug
"Calculated Thoughts" is available at The Deceptionary :: Elegant, Literate, Contemporary Mentalism ... and More


Magical Dimensions Inner circle 5001 Posts 
I like Richard Osterlind's "Breakthough Card System"
Ray 

eric2104 New user saintmartin (French West Indies) 87 Posts 
Hi,
Osterlind's "Breakthrough Card System" is great. It's even better if you MEMORIZE it. I've used it for years as a memorized deck, and it serves me well. You then have the advantage of a memorized deck (where there is a bijection between card identity and position in the deck) and of a system (where a known card can give you the identity of the next one). This in itself is not a necessity, but it may come handy in the (unlikely, but still possible) event of a mental block with the memorized deck. By the way, memorizing a full deck is not such a feat: in my 25 years of performing magic, I have memorized 3 different stacks, and it never took me more than a day to memorize one (and even though I mostly use Osterlind's today, I still remember the other 2). Just put your mind to it, and design your own mnemonics. The method will stick in your mind for life... Hope that helps. Eric.
"All magic is mental"
Tony Shiels. 

MarkFarrar Veteran user U.S.A. 376 Posts 
I think there is a subtle but significant difference between a mathematical stack (e.g. Bart Harding, Boris Wild) and a true memorised stack.
To do the sort of effect that Simon Aronson describes in all of his books, you cannot afford the time to perform even the easiest of mental calculations to locate a card. So, if you want to learn a true memorised deck, there are two basic options: use mnemonics or learn it by rote. The former is useful, since mnemonics are a versatile tool that can be used for other purposes. The latter is not actually that difficult  think how many things you already know, and you will realise that learning a further 52 items is no great challenge. So, shuffle a deck and learn it  it won't take you that long, and you have a powerful tool at your disposal!
Mark S. Farrar
Email: [email]MarkFarrar@TheMagicCircle.co.uk[/email] Web: www.MagicSquaresBook.com, www.RandMPublishing.com, www.TheDailyGoalMachine.com, www.ParvoBuster.com 

ddyment Inner circle Gibsons, BC, Canada 2297 Posts 
A lot of otherwisewellinformed people completely miss the point when it comes to a discussion of algorithmic stacks with relation to memorized deck work. They assume that the former is not memorized, and therefore not a real memorized deck. Well of course... if it's not memorized, it's not memorized! But that's not the point.
A "true" memorized deck is one in which you have actually learned which card is at which position. There are two principal ways in which this is accomplished. One is to devise some sort of algorithmic relationship between the cards and their positions; the second is to devise 104 mnemonic representations (of the cards and the positions), and then construct relationships between the two. In both cases, the deck is not truly memorized until the intermediate constructions have "fallen away", and you actually know the stack. The advantage of the latter approach is that there are no constraints on card placement, and thus the stack can be designed to have various effects (such as Poker deals) "built in". Probably the two "best" examples of this technique are the Aronson and the Tamariz stacks. The advantage of the algorithmic approach (assuming a welldesigned algorithm) is that if a card/position is temporarily forgotten in the heat of performance, it's still possible (albeit a bit slower) to reconstruct same without difficulty. Which is why it's commonly the choice for those who aren't performing on a daily basis. I'll forgo modesty by suggesting that the "best" two examples of this technique are the Bart Harding stack and my own QuickStack. [And before anyone asks, the Charles Gauci stack is also quite good, though the resulting sequence exhibits a fairly easytodiscover pattern; the Boris Wild stack is even more obvious, and considerably more difficult to apply. The Martin Joyal stack is a sort of hybrid of the two approaches, with an (initial) learning time that falls between that of the mnemonic representation approach, and the truly algorithmic approach (which can be learned in about half an hour).] ... Doug
"Calculated Thoughts" is available at The Deceptionary :: Elegant, Literate, Contemporary Mentalism ... and More


Sid Mayer Special user Santa Fe, NM 656 Posts 
The section on mnemonics in Greater Magic provides a system for memorizing a truly shuffled deck by simply running through it once (as in counting the cards or under the guise of removing Jokers). It will take work to learn, but once you have it cold, you have an awesome tool.
Sid
All the world's a stage ... and everybody on it is overacting.


Denis Behr Special user Germany 686 Posts 
Quote:
On 20021102 20:35, ddyment wrote: It is very possible to just learn a memorized deck by brute force with no mnemonic help at all. Sit down and learn which card occupies which position. I know... I did... Denis 

Adam V Special user 603 Posts 
Likewise. Took me a lot less time than using the mnemonic method and is just as effective.
Adam V  9 out of 10 dentists recommend him.


Nicodemus Special user 644 Posts 
Maybe it is like exercise equipment... What is it that you really USE ?!
My preference, since it simply is what I learned first, is the Six Hour Memorized Stack.
" Res Non Verba "
" Deeds Not Words " 

The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Shuffled not Stirred » » Re: Memorized Deck (1 Likes)  
Go to page 1~2~3 [Next] 
[ Top of Page ] 
All content & postings Copyright © 20012021 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.21 seconds requiring 5 database queries. 
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < 