

landmark Inner circle within a triangle 4763 Posts 
Given fractions a/b and c/d not equal to each other or zero. Give a convincing argument that (a+b)/(c+d) lies somewhere between the two given fractions.
Jack Shalom
Gerald Deutsch's Perverse Magic: The First Sixteen Years available now.
All proceeds to nonprofit charity Open Heart Magic. You can read my daily blog at Musings, Memories, and Magic 
LobowolfXXX Inner circle La Famiglia 1192 Posts 
I'm assuming you mean (a+c)/(b+d).
"Torture doesn't work" lol
Guess they forgot to tell Bill Buckley. "...as we reason and love, we are able to hope. And hope enables us to resist those things that would enslave us." 
stanalger Special user St. Louis, MO 996 Posts 
Assume a,b,c, and d are positive.
and a/b < c/d. Multiply both sides of this inequality by bd to get: ad < cb. Add ab to both sides to get ad + ab < cb + ab. Factor: a(d+b) < b(c+a). Divide both sides by b*(d+b) to get a/b < (a+c)/(b+d). Going back to ad < cb, add cd to both sides to get ad + cd < cb +cd. Factor: d(a+c) < c(b+d). Divide both sides by d*(b+d) to get (a+c)/(b+d) < c/d. Hence a/b < (a+c)/(b+d) < c/d. 
stanalger Special user St. Louis, MO 996 Posts 
The argument in the previous post applies whenever b and d are nonzero
and have the same sign. (I.e. whenever bd>0.) But if b and d don't have the same sign, the result may or may not hold. (Let a=1, b=2,c=1, d=3 to see a counterexample.) 
stanalger Special user St. Louis, MO 996 Posts 
Quote:
On 20060222 12:37, stanalger wrote: Correction: If bd<0, the result WILL NOT hold. Either (a/b) > (a+c)/(b+d) or (a+c)/(b+d) > (c/d) or (a+c)/(b+d) is undefined. 
landmark Inner circle within a triangle 4763 Posts 
Quote:
On 20060222 11:54, LobowolfXXX wrote: Quite right.
Gerald Deutsch's Perverse Magic: The First Sixteen Years available now.
All proceeds to nonprofit charity Open Heart Magic. You can read my daily blog at Musings, Memories, and Magic 
landmark Inner circle within a triangle 4763 Posts 
Nice, stan. Especially like the bd<0 analysis.
Okay, now how about a nice nonalgebraic argument that requires no more than fifth grade math? (Assume a, b, c, d all > 0) Jack
Gerald Deutsch's Perverse Magic: The First Sixteen Years available now.
All proceeds to nonprofit charity Open Heart Magic. You can read my daily blog at Musings, Memories, and Magic 
drkptrs1975 Elite user North Eastern PA 452 Posts 
They all have to be whole numbers, greater than 0.
a/b and c/d where (a+c)/(b+d) is somewhere is the middle. c/d < (a+c)/(b+d) > a/b Which is greater a/b or c/d 
landmark Inner circle within a triangle 4763 Posts 
Not sure I understand your post. Are you clarifying/restating the conditions, or offering a solution?
If clarifying, then a,b,c,d must all be >0. Not necessarily whole numbers. For convenience's sake, let's say that a/b < c/d. The problem now is to give a convincing nonalgebraic argument that a/b < (a+c)/(b+d) <c/d using no more than fifth grade mathematics.
Gerald Deutsch's Perverse Magic: The First Sixteen Years available now.
All proceeds to nonprofit charity Open Heart Magic. You can read my daily blog at Musings, Memories, and Magic 
landmark Inner circle within a triangle 4763 Posts 
Okay, due to underwhelming demand, here is my nonalgebraic solution:
Think of each fraction as a rate, specifically apples per dollar. So suppose one store sells 3 apples for $8, and another store sells 5 apples for $10. If I buy from both stores I'll have 8 apples for $18. (Notice this buying from both stores is equivalent to (a+c)/(b+d)) Now let's think about this for a minute. If the first store has a lousy deal, then buying from the second store as well will make my lousy deal somewhat better. But how much better? No matter how good the second store's deal is, my combined deal must be worse than the second store alone, because the bad deal at the first store weakens the strength of the good deal. Hence, the combined deal will be better than the first store, but worse than the second store. Baseball fans might also look at a batting average analogy: if I'm 3 for 10 on one day, and then do better the second day, my combined average is better than 3 for 10, but less than what I did on the second day. Jack
Gerald Deutsch's Perverse Magic: The First Sixteen Years available now.
All proceeds to nonprofit charity Open Heart Magic. You can read my daily blog at Musings, Memories, and Magic 
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Puzzle me this... » » Oy, fractions! (0 Likes) 
[ Top of Page ] 
All content & postings Copyright © 20012020 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.16 seconds requiring 5 database queries. 
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < 