The Magic Café
Username:
Password:
[ Lost Password ]
  [ Forgot Username ]
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Puzzle me this... » » Speaking of cubes... (0 Likes) Printer Friendly Version

LobowolfXXX
View Profile
Inner circle
La Famiglia
1189 Posts

Profile of LobowolfXXX
What's the smallest number than can be expressed as the sum of two cubes...in two different ways?!
"Torture doesn't work" lol
Guess they forgot to tell Bill Buckley.

"...as we reason and love, we are able to hope. And hope enables us to resist those things that would enslave us."
magicjohn2278
View Profile
Special user
Isle of Man UK
536 Posts

Profile of magicjohn2278
.. don't suppose you are going to accept

(1^3)+(2^3)=9

and

(2^3)+(1^3)=9
magicjohn2278
View Profile
Special user
Isle of Man UK
536 Posts

Profile of magicjohn2278
Quote:
On 2006-03-17 04:38, magicjohn2278 wrote:
.. don't suppose you are going to accept

(1^3)+(2^3)=9

and

(2^3)+(1^3)=9


...and if not, then 1729...
Daegs
View Profile
Inner circle
USA
4283 Posts

Profile of Daegs
Zero, in an infinite number of ways.

(-2^3) + (2^3) = 0
(-3^3) + (3^3) = 0
TomasB
View Profile
Inner circle
Sweden
1143 Posts

Profile of TomasB
There is no smallest number with that reasoning, Daegs. You can probably come up with a few examples where the result is smaller than Zero.

/Tomas
Steve Martin
View Profile
Inner circle
1119 Posts

Profile of Steve Martin
1^3 + 12^3 and 9^3 + 10^3

= 1729

(apparently)

What's the smallest number than can be expressed as the sum of two cubes...in three different ways?!
Any man who reads too much and uses his own brain too little falls into lazy habits of thinking.
Albert Einstein
magicjohn2278
View Profile
Special user
Isle of Man UK
536 Posts

Profile of magicjohn2278
Quote:
On 2006-03-17 08:04, Steve Martin wrote:
1^3 + 12^3 and 9^3 + 10^3

= 1729

(apparently)

What's the smallest number than can be expressed as the sum of two cubes...in three different ways?!


You've GOT to be kidding!
stanalger
View Profile
Special user
St. Louis, MO
996 Posts

Profile of stanalger
Quote:
On 2006-03-17 08:04, Steve Martin wrote:

What's the smallest number than can be expressed as the sum of two cubes...in three different ways?!


87539319
Steve Martin
View Profile
Inner circle
1119 Posts

Profile of Steve Martin
... which, coincidentally, is my phone number.
Any man who reads too much and uses his own brain too little falls into lazy habits of thinking.
Albert Einstein
Daegs
View Profile
Inner circle
USA
4283 Posts

Profile of Daegs
I wouldnt really say negative numbers are "smaller" than zero, quiet the opposite.


Zero is the smallest number, at least imho.
TomasB
View Profile
Inner circle
Sweden
1143 Posts

Profile of TomasB
Quote:
On 2006-03-17 23:26, Daegs wrote:
Zero is the smallest number, at least imho.

Expect some trouble when it comes to inequalities, logic and programming. Smile

/Tomas
Daegs
View Profile
Inner circle
USA
4283 Posts

Profile of Daegs
Well certainly -4 < 0 but which is "smaller"?

smaller /larger refers to reality and in reality there is no zero or negative numbers.... which is why I posted what I did.

The way I see it (when it comes to smaller/larger), is that negative numbers have a greater magnitude in the opposite direction of positives.

Viewing magnitude, I see zero as "smaller" than -1000 for example.


ANYWAY, if you look at it that way that less than = smaller, then the answer is negative infinity as you can keep giving it larger and larger negatives to be cubed and added..


All in all a very poorly worded puzzle imho....
TomasB
View Profile
Inner circle
Sweden
1143 Posts

Profile of TomasB
The words "smallest number" was probably a hint that he was talking about maths. Zero and negative you of course find in reality. Your teacher probably explained zero as "none" and negative as "owing". Nevertheless the problem poser spoke of "number" and not fruits or animals.

I agree that the wording of the puzzle could have been stricter, but it's easy to reason that "There is no smallest number." is such a boring answer that he must have meant something else.


Since I'm not very good with Diophantine problems, did you guys try different solutions or was there some other way of solving this?

/Tomas
LobowolfXXX
View Profile
Inner circle
La Famiglia
1189 Posts

Profile of LobowolfXXX
I had 1729 in mind, but interesting theoretical follow-up you guys had while I was out of town. Smile
"Torture doesn't work" lol
Guess they forgot to tell Bill Buckley.

"...as we reason and love, we are able to hope. And hope enables us to resist those things that would enslave us."
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Puzzle me this... » » Speaking of cubes... (0 Likes)
[ Top of Page ]
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2020 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved.
This page was created in 0.09 seconds requiring 5 database queries.
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café
are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic.
> Privacy Statement <

ROTFL Billions and billions served! ROTFL