|
|
|||
| Go to page [Previous] 1~2~3~4~5~6~7~8~9~10 [Next] | ||||||||||
|
Harry Lorayne 1926 - 2023 New York City 8558 Posts
|
Scott: I wasn't pleased or thrilled with the exposure. It was unnecessary; Penn is good enough to do without it. But - I wrote a complete editorial about Penn & Teller's exposures many years ago, in APOCALYPSE, basically saying that it didn't much bother me. Anyway... HL
If the gag works for you, Rick, that's fine. I've written about this a few times, so forgive the redundancy - when I was doing card-magic gigs over half a century ago, part of my "deal" was always that they have two decks of their own cards at the venue. Those are the cards I'd use. I've also written, many times, that any time a magician uses his own deck he loses a large percentage of the effect (as against doing it with a borrowed deck). I believe that's true no matter what the laymen say. But, that's just my take on the subject. Best - HARRY L.
[email]harrylorayne@earthlink.net[/email]
http://www.harrylorayne.com http://www.harryloraynemagic.com |
|||||||||
|
stoneunhinged Inner circle 3068 Posts
|
Quote:
On 2008-05-10 12:31, Harry Lorayne wrote: WHOA! This post is a keeper, for MANY reasons. Thanks Harry. |
|||||||||
|
magician8 Veteran user 383 Posts
|
Harry,
just a quick question, If you were actually doing Macdonald's aces, how would you have felt? I'm sure you would've worked it out but what about the situation? for a moment you would've lost control and mabe the lady could have grabbed the cards before you could react. stupid question, 8 |
|||||||||
|
spatlind Special user still moving 863 Posts
|
Cheers Harry. I can't imagine I'd have been best pleased myself! I think Rick said there was another magician working down the hall who got called out on something that had been exposed a few minutes earlier.
Scott
Actions lie louder than words - Carolyn Wells
I believe in God, only I spell it Nature - Frank Lloyd Wright. |
|||||||||
|
rick727 Regular user Houston, TX, USA 191 Posts
|
Unfortunately spectators usually don't arrive at my gigs with a deck of cards. If they did then I would use them regardless of the condition. If the condition were horrible, then I have a few tricks that do not require sleights. If the condition is good, then I too have been known to use them in performance. I was recently working a "Valentine's in Vegas" function at a local church. I did walk around magic before dinner and before the "fun gambling" started. An elder lady accused me of having a "trick" deck (of course, I did not), so I gave her my deck and picked up a fresh deck from one of the tables and did my set. I have a friend who is a member of that church and that lady still talks about me doing magic with a borrowed deck. I often ask the audience if anyone has a deck of cards, but they rarely do
Quote:
On 2008-05-10 18:25, spatlind wrote: Scott, yes another magician did get exposed. The other magician, Scott Wells, is a competent professional. I doubt he flashed the pinky break, but you never know. Of course, Scott could not be certain that the exposure in question led to him getting called out, but he suspected it might have something to do with it. The general point is that this exposure is bad. Harry agreed, but said in the long run it did not really matter. I can't argue with that. That seems to be the prevailing opinion of many on this board. I am just glad that most people don't do surreptitious exposure. In fact, I signed a statement when I joined SAM that I would not do it. Maybe I was little naive when I started this thread. -Rick
Practice what you present.
Present what you practice. |
|||||||||
|
sparks New user Charlottesville, Virginia 89 Posts
|
Harry, educational (and entertaining) insights for sure... thank you for sharing. Maybe it's says something about my personality, but I would have loved to have seen that lady's face after she spread the aces.
Tom
Sparks
It's kind of fun to do the impossible - Walt Disney |
|||||||||
|
MagicKim Special user Ã…land, Finland 621 Posts
|
I am totally against any kind of exposure. I feel, as some of you already stated, you can do a fake explanation and make it fun. It does not matter how big or small impact the explanation has, it still has some sort of impact and I don't like that. When I do a show, I want everybody to have a great time and be fooled, as that is a big part of the fun. If one of them knows but doesn't say anything, that still bothers me. I have read the entire thread and eventhough a lot of you have valid points, I will never agree with exposure of any kind.
Kim |
|||||||||
|
Harry Lorayne 1926 - 2023 New York City 8558 Posts
|
Please don't misunderstand, folks. I've stated some of my feelings/observations, and so on. But I am deadset against exposure. Had I been working that trade show where Nathan was doing his exposing, I'd probably have been ready to kill! I've been fortunate, exposure never affected me, but I sure am aware as to how wrong it is and how harmful it can be. HL
[email]harrylorayne@earthlink.net[/email]
http://www.harrylorayne.com http://www.harryloraynemagic.com |
|||||||||
|
TomasB Inner circle Sweden 1151 Posts
|
Quote: I don't quite follow this. How would you turn the leader packet over in a MacDonald's routine specifically? In MacDonald's Aces the Leader Packet is clean as it has four ordinary Aces in it. What did she expect to find if she had any knowledge about the routine and gaffs? Wouldn't she dive for any of the other packets?
...I purposely ended the effect by turning over the 4-ace packet as you would when doing MacDonald's Aces. She, as expected, grabbed the aces as the eye-gleam got brighter. She was going to show the group how smart/knowledgeable she was. She started to exclaim as she spread the aces - "See, there's a differe..." Stop, mouth agape, she was looking at regular cards. Her embarrassment - as I stared at her expectantly - was very obvious. /Tomas |
|||||||||
|
Harry Lorayne 1926 - 2023 New York City 8558 Posts
|
She dove for both, TomasB, I didn't realize that I had to take the space to get into specifics. I will, for you, in the future. Best - HL
[email]harrylorayne@earthlink.net[/email]
http://www.harrylorayne.com http://www.harryloraynemagic.com |
|||||||||
|
Tim Jahn Special user South Florida 911 Posts
|
Thanks for a great post Harry.
Tim
Andrew, (ASW)
The effects on the DVD and lecture notes are far beyond your abilities. (They require mastery of the mechanic's grip.) It would only break your heart. Sincerely, Darwin Ortiz.......(This post has got to be in my top 5.) |
|||||||||
|
loyaleagle Special user Montgomery Village, Maryland 567 Posts
|
I have to say that Mr. Nathan's exposure "trick," which I agree with most here is a very poor presentation style and unethical, is especially upsetting to me. I am a beginner in cards. I have learned about most of the tricks that regular card workers do, but I am just now getting comfortable with the techniques. I have a little work-out list that I try and practice every day.
When Rick posted the list that Nathan was exposing...well he basically just wrote down that little list of mine. I don't even know how to feel about it. The very things I'm working very hard to master are in one sense being taken away by another magician much more accomplished than I. Of course, I will keep on working on those techniques because the magic really isn't in the slights themselves, but the performance. Also, I know it is certainly healthy to have an audience that at least thinks they know something about card magic. But Nathan's exposure goes overboard and while it might not hurt your normal knuckle-buster, it's hard for guys like me to change leads in mid stride like Harry described above. Oh and one more thing. I'm pretty sure that all of the stuff that Paul Nathan exposed could probably be found exposed on Youtube. So which is worse? In my opinion, Nathan has done a worse thing because he is a "real" worker who should have a certain respect for all the years he's put into it. Youtubers shouldn't be exposing tricks, but to be honest, I've found some of the tutorials helpful and I feel like most of the people who watch those videos are interested in learning the basics like me. Thoughts?
Visit my blog: ScienceIsMagic.com
|
|||||||||
|
Phil Pearce Loyal user Dallas, GA 260 Posts
|
I think the most disturbing thing here is that Mr. Nathan, in spite of clear and irrefutable evidence to the contrary, repeatedly denies that he is exposing. His hubristic "you just don't get it" attitude coupled with his refusal to admit to what he admits to is troubling. I think he actually believes that although he admits to exposing, he is not actually exposing. Can't argue with that!
Phil |
|||||||||
|
erlandish Inner circle Vancouver, Canada 1254 Posts
|
Nice stories, Harry. Thanks for taking the time to write them up here.
|
|||||||||
|
Tina I Regular user Oslo/ Norway 194 Posts
|
First: An apology for my outbreak earlier in this thread. I was way out of line. I lost my temper for some reason, I usually does not do that. I'm sorry.
Second: As for the topic of this thread I think Mr Lorayne said it all in the most beautiful way. Third, in my own words: Exposure is not good. I'm not for it of course. But when it has happened it has happened and we all have to live with that. And one of the things we should take note of, which also is nicely pointed out in the aforementioned post, is that the actual impact on lay people is practically unnoticeable. To laypeople magic is about secrets. They think that they can spot a 'trick' if they know a secret move or two. However, the truth is that they get so hung up on looking for 'the secret' that they go practically blind. It doesn't matter if someone know about the double lift if it's not possible to spot your double lift. And of course: you should learn a few different ways to do a DL and vary them through out. A spec that know about getting a break under the cards would be hopelessly lost if you do a pushover DL. |
|||||||||
|
spatlind Special user still moving 863 Posts
|
You are dead right Tina. And for all the posts we have read over the years from the people who have stated that exposure has been something that they can just run with and often turn to their advantage, there are as many of us amateurs who wish that they would never have had to come up against such adversity. However, we should all have answers to these questions!!!
Scott
Actions lie louder than words - Carolyn Wells
I believe in God, only I spell it Nature - Frank Lloyd Wright. |
|||||||||
|
Jordini Inner circle 2764 Posts
|
On behalf of Paul Nathan (because 98% of people who posted here have no idea who he is), you can say anything you want about him, you can love him or hate him. The man is one heck of a performer. I've seen him many times and he is extremely good at what he does. Except for that one time he hit me in the face with a whip, but that's a completely different issue.
|
|||||||||
|
Magicmike1949 Special user 643 Posts
|
I don't have to know Mr. Nathan to have an opinion about what he is doing. I don't love or hate him. But I wonder how he would feel if the next time he was performing his set, I was in the audience and when he finished performing his McDonald's aces routine I told the rest of the audience how he did it. I doubt he'd appreciate my exposure. It's simple:"Do unto others......."
|
|||||||||
|
kammagic Inner circle 1304 Posts
|
The only effect I can think of that has lost its impact because of over exposure is the pulling your finger off trick that everyones grampa does. Untill EVERYONES grampa does Mcdonalds Aces I think we are safe.
|
|||||||||
|
Alewishus Inner circle parts unknown 1230 Posts
|
I just realized something...
I love Mr. Nathan. There, I've said it. Say what you will, but I love Mr. Nathan. That wasn't so bad. A.
Sack subs, ok Ross?
We miss you asper. |
|||||||||
| The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Right or Wrong? » » Blatant exposure by Paul Nathan - Tradeshow magician » » TOPIC IS LOCKED (0 Likes) | ||||||||||
| Go to page [Previous] 1~2~3~4~5~6~7~8~9~10 [Next] | ||||||||||
| [ Top of Page ] |
|
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2026 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.06 seconds requiring 5 database queries. |
|
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement <
![]() |