This is the first post in a thread that is dedicated to self-reference.

This is the second post. It has one word mispeld.

This sentence contains a single error.

This post contains no contradictions.
Unlike the one that it's directly under.

Though they valiantly try to turn the thread to something intelligible, the self-referential posts never seem able to get over themselves.

As of this post, I've posted once more than John.

I'd reply but I have no sense of self

I have extra, if you need some.

Do you need a referral for that self?

I have references.

This sentence has three a's, one b, two c's, two d's, thirty six e's, three f's, three g's, eleven h's, nine i's, one j, one k, three l's, one m, eighteen n's, twelve o's, one p, one q, eight r's, twenty six s's, twenty t's, two u's, five v's, seven w's, three x's, four y's, and one z.

I'd like to take the time to respond to this post, but I've got a lot of important things to do right now.

What if there were no hypothetical questions?

Self reverence trumps self reference and there can be no Hypotheticals.

This post claims that it magnificently accomplishes both self-reference and self-reverence, but it is mistaken.

What in the blazes are you all talking about? Are you all insane? Am I stupid or drunk? All of the above?

I don't want to know the answer to this question, but am I the only who is going to read my post?

My post can not be mistaken due to the intention in which it was written...but it could be mistaken by the reader who read it incorrectly thereby mistaking my intent.

This sentence is the same forward as it is backwards. dab yM .ecnetes tnereffid a fo gnikniht neeb evah tsum I hO

Oops my bad ... wrung forum.

This sentence expresses amusement at Josh's sentence's success in being self-referential and its simultaneous failure in telling the truth.