|
|
harris![]() Inner circle Harris Deutsch 8695 Posts ![]() |
For crazy man handcuffs.
Last night I decided to bring back my one band version. (I am guessing many others also have come up with this). The band can penetrate a cup handle, then my thumb and finger..., and then a spectator's closed thumb and finger. The look in spectators eyes..., priceless Working paid shows is wonderful. The gig for the Dream Factory on Saturday was even better. Usually the puppets are the most talked about after... that night it was the Strait Jacket...(recently brought out of retirement).
Harris Deutsch aka dr laugh
drlaugh4u@gmail.com music, magic and marvelous toys http://magician.org/member/drlaugh4u |
Jia Truong![]() New user Australia 38 Posts ![]() |
Interesting. I haven't seen it performed this way. Is there a performance video?
|
Al Angello![]() Eternal Order Collegeville, Pa. USA 11047 Posts ![]() |
Excellent choice Harris. This trick usually fools magicians.
Al Angello The Comic Juggler/Magician
http://www.juggleral.com http://home.comcast.net/~juggleral/ "Footprints on your ceiling are almost gone" |
meyegr![]() Special user Only able to muster 802 Posts ![]() |
Quote:
On 2009-10-09 10:42, Al Angello wrote: Serious? |
John Long![]() Inner circle New Jersey 2772 Posts ![]() |
It is possible to use the CMH method to have a rubber band penetrate other objects, however, the visual discrepancy is more obvious, and would need to be covered.
The linking of a band, instead of an unlinking would not have this limitation. (check out Link!) for versions of this. John
Breathtaking Magic;
Not Breath Taking |
Futureal![]() Inner circle 1613 Posts ![]() |
As Ammar states in his manuscript, the reason why CMH is so devastating is that when the bands are actually unlinked, they still appear to be linked.
Doing the trick with only one band and using a cup handle or a finger or a playing card with a hole in it etc doesn't provide this, and you lose the visual "melting through" effect of the original. Just a thought. |
harris![]() Inner circle Harris Deutsch 8695 Posts ![]() |
I have been to many lectures by Ammar who is a great teacher.
I love the way the bands still look linked and then (Shazam) are not. Don't know the theory with one band, but I do know the look on peoples faces when the band penetrates their closed finger and thumb. (perhaps this is set up by doing it suspiciously with my own hand first) On my possible shopping list: Dinosaur or Star Rubber Bands.....(see other Café threads on these interesting props) Harris
Harris Deutsch aka dr laugh
drlaugh4u@gmail.com music, magic and marvelous toys http://magician.org/member/drlaugh4u |
Angelo the Magician Loyal user Vienna(Austria/Europe) 217 Posts ![]() |
I share the opinion of Futureal in 100 % !
Often we (and so do I) think, a change makes something better and we are so proud of our idea that we do not realize, it became worse. Of course in the first months an effect exists there will appear a lot of new ideas and some of them will improve the effect. But after so much years of being performed by so much magicians it is not very probably (although it is possible) that a change will improve an effect. Angelo |
Jonathan P.![]() Inner circle Belgium 1484 Posts ![]() |
I think Etienne Pradier deos the unlinking with one band and the stem of a wine glass. The glass tube does an interesting visual distorsion that can, in the proper angle, reproduce the optical illusion that we can obtain with two rubberbands (sort of...)
Jonathan. |
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Rings, strings & things » » Using 1 band instead of 2 (0 Likes) |
[ Top of Page ] |
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2021 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.15 seconds requiring 5 database queries. |
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < ![]() ![]() ![]() |