|
|
Go to page [Previous] 1~2~3~4 | ||||||||||
Scott F. Guinn![]() Inner circle "Great Scott!" aka "Palms of Putty" & "Poof Daddy G" 6584 Posts ![]() |
I never posted a vid, no, and never intended to. My website and the rights to my books and DVD have been sold--I am out of the magic retail business. PB&J is no longer for sale as a separate item and may never be again. The books will be republished in either perfect bound or hardbound format and rereleased by the new owner. I can't speak to when that will be--I no longer have anything to do with it. The website address will link to his page when he gets it working and "up," so keep trying it:
http://www.greatscott-itsmagic.com I am concentrating my efforts on performing for the public and on other areas of my life and am out of the business of selling to magicians.
"Love God, laugh more, spend more time with the ones you love, play with children, do good to those in need, and eat more ice cream. There is more to life than magic tricks." - Scott F. Guinn
My Lybrary Page |
|||||||||
radiantentertainment Regular user Donald Collins 112 Posts ![]() |
I want to thank Mr. Guinn for the advice on the SG. I have to admit I am not familiar with Mr. Guinns material on the SG.
I fell in love with the SG the moment I first watched it used. It was performed poorly but I could see the potential.I use the SG only for a sponge ball production, vanish, and reappearance now. These postings have started my gears turning for more though. Thanks to everyone. To try to talk some of you into dusting off your SG I'll explain my sponge ball opening. I'm not a magic author so bear with me. The vanishes are done in french drop position SG'ing the ball instead of dropping it. The appearances are done by passing the hand with the SG in front of the clean hand in a spell bound like move. Using the SG to show a the invisible ball everyone plays it off as a joke. There is no heat on the SG at all. While transfering the invisible ball from hand to hand to display it to spectators on both sides direct attention toward a child by asking "Can you say alakazam?". The child naturally says alakazam. At that moment make the sponge ball appear in the clean hand. Then after the appearance all eyes are on the ball as the dirty hand falls to the wayside. The SG is not loaded so the hand appears very natural. Raise the dirty hand and do a couple of transfers to display the ball to both sides again. This is also for consistancy. Since I use 2" super soft the SG is almost covered. Ask a child if they can say alakazoo. When they do, vanish the ball. Do another transfer for display. Say alakazam to make the ball appear, after producing the ball offer it for examination. The split second that my left hand places the ball on the table to be examined I ditch the SG in my right pocket. I find that after this simple set of moves my regular sponge routine has much more validity. It has became a much more powerful piece. If this explantion is not clear PM me and I will describe it in more detail. Let me know what you think.
Life is not a dress rehearsal!
Less is more. & Knock'em dead! |
|||||||||
Scott F. Guinn![]() Inner circle "Great Scott!" aka "Palms of Putty" & "Poof Daddy G" 6584 Posts ![]() |
First, while I truly appreciate the respectful attitude, please call me Scott. We are peers and hopefully will become friends, and I am no more important than anyone else here, so the need for formality and deference is non-existent when addressing me. If I were on the level of some of our more celebrated members such as Wesley James or Larry Becker, that deference would be appropriate, but I'm just a journeyman magician in Podunk, Idaho! (Again, though, I sincerely appreciate the underlying attitude!)
I think what you're describing is an excellent use of the gimmick. While there are many uses and applications, we must be careful not to "get greedy with a principle." Find as many uses as possible that add rather than detract from your routines, but do not insert the SG into a routine where it is not needed just because it can be inserted. And even if you have some awesome uses for it, I wouldn't use it for more than one or two routines within the same show. Just my opinion, yours may differ and still be equally or even more valid!
"Love God, laugh more, spend more time with the ones you love, play with children, do good to those in need, and eat more ice cream. There is more to life than magic tricks." - Scott F. Guinn
My Lybrary Page |
|||||||||
radiantentertainment Regular user Donald Collins 112 Posts ![]() |
Till a introduction I call everyone by there last name. Just a force of habit. From now on it will be Scott though.
I am in agreement with you. I only use the SG to open my sponge routine. I do a production, vanish, and reappearance then I rely on no gimmicks. The intial opening with the SG adds conviction to the rest of my sleights. I'm may be starting at a Japanese steak house. I love the egg idea for this.
Life is not a dress rehearsal!
Less is more. & Knock'em dead! |
|||||||||
charliewerner![]() Regular user 164 Posts ![]() |
I think mentalist have better use of the SG then magician. Try it.
"Seeing Joy, Sadness, Anger,Contempt,Surprise, Disgust,Fear on people faces are the motivation of my MAGIC" Charlie Werner (C.C.L)
|
|||||||||
DrVG![]() New user 78 Posts ![]() |
Quote:
On Aug 15, 2003, Greg Arce wrote: Can it be done sleeveless ? |
|||||||||
funsway![]() Inner circle old things in new ways - new things in old ways 9003 Posts ![]() |
DrVG - not sure if Greg posts on this thread any more.
Sleeves have nothing to do with it. The Sanada gimmick allows for concealment of the compressed egg skin. You have to steal the real egg from somewhere with the right hand, but hardly a sleeve. The key is the directed focus to the left hand with the apparent production of the egg after both hands are apparently empty. But, this can be accomplished without the gimmicks at all if one in in control of the audience attention. So, what is the result you desire? What effect will come before and what after? Then you can work backwards to method. I love working with eggs and the breaking to show it is real is a questionable action as it suggests that the produced one may not be real. Why would your audience think that? In the described effect above it was one to impress a magician. Not saying you should not use this acquitment sometime in a routine, just that it may not be necessary depending on how your entire routine evolves.
"the more one pretends at magic, the more awe and wonder will be found in real life." Arnold Furst
eBooks at Lybrary.com * questions at funsway@eversway.com |
|||||||||
Jeff Haas![]() Special user 913 Posts ![]() |
Update...Scott Guinn's routines are now sold by Lybrary.com. There are about 50 different downloads available, including "Peanut Butter & Jelly". (Look on page 2.)
https://www.lybrary.com/scott-f-guinn-m-235.html |
|||||||||
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Ever so sleightly » » Sanada gimmick? (2 Likes) | ||||||||||
Go to page [Previous] 1~2~3~4 |
[ Top of Page ] |
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2021 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.25 seconds requiring 5 database queries. |
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < ![]() ![]() ![]() |