On 2014-02-16 17:16, LobowolfXXX wrote:
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=s_dEhuYiZq8

Here's an ad that I think most media experts would agree is targeting a liberal audience.

On 2014-02-16 16:37, Dannydoyle wrote:
Ok do you believe the same is true of liberal radio (What little of it there is. ) or is it all just as Bob seems to think?

On 2014-02-16 17:08, Bazinga wrote:

Quote:

On 2014-02-16 16:02, Magnus Eisengrim wrote:
the basic message of contemporary conservative populism is "we had a beautiful country, and it is being taken away from us."

I didn't know the American Indians were the contemporary conservative populism.

On 2014-02-16 17:55, LobowolfXXX wrote:
You asked for an example of an ad "designed specifically for liberal audiences." That ad was designed specifically for the 18-34 age bracket (a group that is heavily liberal), and features actors that are primarily female and/or minority and music that certainly isn't intended to resonate with a conservative audience. IMO, that ad is clearly aimed at a liberal audience.

On 2014-02-16 20:04, R.S. wrote:

Quote:

On 2014-02-16 17:55, LobowolfXXX wrote:
You asked for an example of an ad "designed specifically for liberal audiences." That ad was designed specifically for the 18-34 age bracket (a group that is heavily liberal), and features actors that are primarily female and/or minority and music that certainly isn't intended to resonate with a conservative audience. IMO, that ad is clearly aimed at a liberal audience.

Lobo, which extreme left-wing political program airs/aired that ad?

Ron

On 2014-02-16 17:55, LobowolfXXX wrote:
You asked for one example of an ad "designed specifically for liberal audiences." That ad was designed specifically for the 18-34 age bracket (a group that is heavily liberal), and features actors that are primarily female and/or minority and music that certainly isn't intended to resonate with a conservative audience. IMO, that ad is clearly aimed at a liberal audience.

On 2014-02-16 21:10, mastermindreader wrote:

Quote:

On 2014-02-16 17:55, LobowolfXXX wrote:
You asked for one example of an ad "designed specifically for liberal audiences." That ad was designed specifically for the 18-34 age bracket (a group that is heavily liberal), and features actors that are primarily female and/or minority and music that certainly isn't intended to resonate with a conservative audience. IMO, that ad is clearly aimed at a liberal audience.

Completely disagree that the type of ad (ie. paychic readings) is something that would resonate more with liberal audiences. I don't think that politics really has much to do with whether or not people are interested in that sort of thing.

But if you're saying that ads featuring minorities, women and contemporary music appeal more to liberals than conservatives, that's an entirely different question. And the answer, if your premise is true, would be very telling.

As far as the age demographic goes, I'd agree. But now we're talking about age appropriateness rather than political appeal.

So I don't believe you've provided a clear example at all.

On 2014-02-16 22:42, mastermindreader wrote:
Completely disagree. Most skeptics of psi phenomena tend to be liberal, while believers in supernatural events are common in conservative areas. (Witness yesterday's death of religious snake handler, Jamie Coots.) And some of the most notable psychic readers have been very conservative in their political views.

On 2014-02-16 23:01, LobowolfXXX wrote:

Quote:

On 2014-02-16 22:42, mastermindreader wrote:
Completely disagree. Most skeptics of psi phenomena tend to be liberal, while believers in supernatural events are common in conservative areas. (Witness yesterday's death of religious snake handler, Jamie Coots.) And some of the most notable psychic readers have been very conservative in their political views.

In my personal experience, more of my liberal friends than conservative ones are apt to believe in various things (psychic phenomena included, but not just psychic phenomena, i.e. Crystals, fung shui, etc.) that I would classify as a secular parallel to the "biblical money code." Moreover, that's consistent with the fact some Christian conservatives disbelieve specifically because of their religious beliefs.

On 2014-02-17 00:13, mastermindreader wrote:

Quote:

On 2014-02-16 23:01, LobowolfXXX wrote:

Quote:

On 2014-02-16 22:42, mastermindreader wrote:
Completely disagree. Most skeptics of psi phenomena tend to be liberal, while believers in supernatural events are common in conservative areas. (Witness yesterday's death of religious snake handler, Jamie Coots.) And some of the most notable psychic readers have been very conservative in their political views.

In my personal experience, more of my liberal friends than conservative ones are apt to believe in various things (psychic phenomena included, but not just psychic phenomena, i.e. Crystals, fung shui, etc.) that I would classify as a secular parallel to the "biblical money code." Moreover, that's consistent with the fact some Christian conservatives disbelieve specifically because of their religious beliefs.

No, they don't disbelieve because of their religious views. Actually the BELIEVE IT because of those views. They reject it precisely because they "know" that it is the work of the devil, not because they doubt that it exists.