|
|
Go to page [Previous] 1~2 | ||||||||||
MagicKingdom10 Veteran user 316 Posts |
Quote:
On Nov 13, 2014, charlie_d wrote: Wow that is pure brilliance! The first card does obtain a natural distinctive crimp with extensive handling. You could do this with a brand new deck of cards as well?
I Love You God
|
|||||||||
Steven Keyl Inner circle Washington, D.C. 2630 Posts |
Quote:
On Nov 12, 2014, MagicKingdom10 wrote: I perform Asi's version the way it is written up in the book (except for computing the position which I've simplified) and have done it so often now that when I take my first peek, I'm rarely off by more than 1 or two cards so any adjustment takes a fraction of a second. So for me, adding multiple shorts wouldn't provide any substantive benefit although I do think it's a very good idea, especially for those who have a tougher time estimating the initial position. And like you say, when you get good at that handling, you can do it without ever looking at the deck which is a definite advantage over any peek method. Nice thinking.
Steven Keyl - The Human Whisperer!
B2B Magazine Test! Best impromptu progressive Ace Assembly ever! "If you ever find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause, and reflect." --Mark Twain |
|||||||||
MagicKingdom10 Veteran user 316 Posts |
Thanks Steven I perform Asi Wind's ACAAN without peeking at all and since the shorts are never noticed, I see this as a win-win move!
I do practice the thumb counting religiously. The strategically positioned shorts not only act as tactile indices they also significantly speed up the count. It is now an entirely different ball game because the playing field is completely lifted
I Love You God
|
|||||||||
charlie_d Loyal user 247 Posts |
MK10: Doesn't work with a new deck. I think this happens because I stack with faros. It's like a natural crimp, as you say.
It probably also means I'm staying in position 1 too much. I should cut more, but I find it easier to have card 1 in position 1. |
|||||||||
MagicKingdom10 Veteran user 316 Posts |
Thanks for the clarification Charlie, I intentionally create crimps to be able to do what you do. I'm not sure if laypeople could detect the difference between natural and intentional crimps
I Love You God
|
|||||||||
JBSmith1978 Veteran user NY 389 Posts |
Histed used corner shorts, I recommend his book. For an alternative to the breather see Kwik Key Kard in
The Cardiste. |
|||||||||
stickmondoo Veteran user 306 Posts |
I always have a top cutting corner short in # 1 and a bottom cutting corner short in # 30. This second is because A King of spades gets named a lot and B I find it easier to calculate from thirty rather than 27 I case I want to spell to a named card. One that happens a lot is named card is seven of spades. Just corner cut 30 to bottom without even looking and count 7. It's a good one. All the cards from 30 to 48 get named a lot. I also have a small pencil dot on 7 of hearts with edge Mark too. I don't use this in my memorized deck effects, but if someone asks to shuffle I let them then use the pencil dotted card to do some cool things. It's quite amazing what cool effects you can create with just a corner short and pencil dot. If I'm feeling lazy I use the top cutting corner short to help me get quick doubles or pick ups for Braue additions. Sorry about my spelling ü
|
|||||||||
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Shuffled not Stirred » » What work (if any) do you put in your stack? (27 Likes) | ||||||||||
Go to page [Previous] 1~2 |
[ Top of Page ] |
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2024 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.02 seconds requiring 5 database queries. |
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < |