|
|
Go to page [Previous] 1~2~3 [Next] | ||||||||||
FrankieF Veteran user So Cal 334 Posts |
I agree Scam school was fine when it used to be a bunch of fun bar bets and puzzles it's a shame they're doing this.
|
|||||||||
Luccky Regular user 107 Posts |
These release is a very bad news. I thought Nardi had more ethics. I loved these products and his style. Money, money, money, as usual.
|
|||||||||
robbie mcgrath Loyal user Ireland 233 Posts |
Shocking just shocking
|
|||||||||
Raj Suman Veteran user 318 Posts |
Quote:
On Oct 23, 2014, Chaz93 wrote: It is ridiculos to show the workings of the magic wallet on a youtube video like this. it is some of the worse exposure I have seen of this manner of prop. can we ask for it to be taken away please. |
|||||||||
tophatter Inner circle connecticut 3329 Posts |
The wallet is to bulky !
|
|||||||||
JackMagic Inner circle 1982 Posts |
Quote:
On Dec 5, 2014, Raj Suman wrote: Have to agree , No word from Peter why he would want to team up with brushwood ? After all , if he's teamed up with this , who knows what's the next item from The Alakazam will be exposed by brushwood After all the support we have given to Alakazam this is a kick in the teeth to magicians and mentalist everywhere ! |
|||||||||
FrankieF Veteran user So Cal 334 Posts |
It's kind of scary to see where magic is headed.
|
|||||||||
1KJ Inner circle Warning: We will run out of new tricks in 4385 Posts |
I'm not interested in anything from scamschool.
|
|||||||||
JackMagic Inner circle 1982 Posts |
Still no word from Peter to explain why he allowed this ?
|
|||||||||
warren Inner circle uk 4138 Posts |
Card to wallet is so much stronger when the spectators signed card comes out of a zippered compartment and made even stronger when the wallet has a clasp on it but this has neither, however I've no doubt it is a great wallet with lots to offer.
|
|||||||||
TheGingerWizard Special user 733 Posts |
The exposure is utterly disgusting. For someone who prides himself so much on customer service and satisfaction; Peter Nardi has just given a massive kick in the teeth to anyone who has bought any one of his wallets. Not good.
|
|||||||||
Jamie Ferguson Inner circle Alba Gu Brà th 3640 Posts |
I don't think there's there's anything wrong with Peter selling the rights per se. That's completely his decision.
I think the issue is with Brian Brushyourwood then exposing other peoples work, e.g. Elbert L Gardner's ShoGun principle, Steve Draun's RMW approach and Miller's Hollywood or Bust (using Nardi's stealth peek) to name but three. I don't think Peter has any control over this once the rights are sold however I can't imagine the creators are very happy. The thing that worries me most is that professional tools are being exposed to so many people. If just one performance is ruined by someone saying "You're using one of those magic wallets", as a result of seeing or hearing about the exposure vids then that's one performance too many.
When the chips are down, the duvet is uncomfortable.
|
|||||||||
JackMagic Inner circle 1982 Posts |
Quote:
On Dec 8, 2014, TheGingerWizard wrote: As Everyone Knows Brushwood and his track record for Exposure this is a Disgrace, to sell out to him knowing his track record , this is a kick in the teeth to Magicians and mentalist worldwide Not just for this wallet but all wallets and anyone that has now seen this is going to question " Have you got a magic wallet" Case of Profits before Ethics |
|||||||||
JackMagic Inner circle 1982 Posts |
Quote:
On Dec 8, 2014, Jamie Ferguson wrote: It all depends on how important you consider our Art, Put it this way do you think Richard Osterland would sell to Brushwood his Bank Night Routine or his C***re T** ? I don't think so |
|||||||||
JackMagic Inner circle 1982 Posts |
Nothing to say Peter ?
|
|||||||||
mhotovy New user Walkersville, MD 1 Post |
While I don't endorse exposure, I have yet to come across ANY spectator that knew of Brian Brushwood, Scam School, or "trick" wallets. Magicians know of all this because we seek this stuff out. John Q. Spectator could care less. Magic performed well can still be wildly entertaining regardless of any spectator knowledge of the subterfuge involved. If all you have in your act is the subterfuge, you're simply someone doing tricks, not a magician.
|
|||||||||
Martin Pulman Inner circle London 3399 Posts |
Quote:
On Dec 21, 2014, mhotovy wrote: Utterly irrelevant. Either you respect magic's code of ethics or you don't. |
|||||||||
Jamie Ferguson Inner circle Alba Gu Brà th 3640 Posts |
Mhotovy is a one post wonder. I wouldn't be surprised if he's associated with the party in question.
When the chips are down, the duvet is uncomfortable.
|
|||||||||
davidpaul$ Inner circle Georgetown, South Carolina 3086 Posts |
Quote:
On Dec 21, 2014, mhotovy wrote: You obviously don't perform regularly at paying gigs.
Guilt will betray you before technique betrays you!
|
|||||||||
Raj Suman Veteran user 318 Posts |
If the secret is what you pay for and the secret has been giving away then maybe all buyers of wallets with these secrets in the past can getting refunds? Maybe a question for conversation around.
|
|||||||||
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Latest and Greatest? » » The Rogue's Wallet (27 Likes) | ||||||||||
Go to page [Previous] 1~2~3 [Next] |
[ Top of Page ] |
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2024 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.02 seconds requiring 5 database queries. |
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < |