|
|
Go to page [Previous] 1~2 | ||||||||||
John C Eternal Order I THINK therefore I wrote 12968 Posts |
If you believe what I believe you'll enjoy the time you spend with me.
If not....NEXT! |
|||||||||
mastermindreader 1949 - 2017 Seattle, WA 12586 Posts |
John-
If I believed what you believe, I'd probably end up DOING time with you. |
|||||||||
funsway Inner circle old things in new ways - new things in old ways 9988 Posts |
I received two PM's from folks asking why I was not posting on this thread. It is heartening to know that people other than posters actually read these threads.
The answer is simple. I mostly agree with what is being said and the OP postured that these are just some of the possible truths. I respect the experience behind each poster's opinions. No reason to post just to say, "me too." Silence does not mean that I do no think other truths are equally important, or more so. Those opinions are just not appropriate here. I am learning a couple of new things herein, and that is good. I have been prompted to review some previous posts by some posting on this thread for congruency or support of the idea. For me, the importance of this thread is helping some answer the question, "should I become a Mentalist?" To the extent that my supporting opinion will encourage continuance -- go for it guys!
"the more one pretends at magic, the more awe and wonder will be found in real life." Arnold Furst
eBooks at https://www.lybrary.com/ken-muller-m-579928.html questions at ken@eversway.com |
|||||||||
doriancaudal Inner circle 1532 Posts |
Quote:
On Jul 11, 2015, IAIN wrote: Couldn't agree more. +1
Hands-off ACAAN - freely chosen card and number : http://doriancaudal.wix.com/miracaan
|
|||||||||
JarJarJared New user 77 Posts |
I have also not been paying attention to that thread, mostly because everyone continues to feel like it is necessary to argue again and again over semantics. It fascinates me. Everyone seems to have this constant obsession with having everyone else agree with them on words and terms that have only sprouted in to this world very recently. We should stop trying to define these words through more words within a forum, and start trying to define them through our own performances and experiences as mentalists, magicians, and whatever else in between.
|
|||||||||
Dr Spektor Eternal Order Carcanis 10781 Posts |
"They are lean and athirst!!!!"
|
|||||||||
mastermindreader 1949 - 2017 Seattle, WA 12586 Posts |
Quote:
On Jul 13, 2015, JarJarJared wrote: Common understanding about definitions are essential to any meaningful conversation. One of the core issues in this thread is what many see as the trivialization of mentalism. Without an understanding of what mentalism is, it's impossible to address, let alone even acknowledge, the problem. |
|||||||||
IAIN Eternal Order england 18807 Posts |
Regarding the trivialization issue - I do believe it happens...its just that its probably always happened - its just that because of social media, forums and so on, that we've become more aware of it - its become more in our collective faces...though there are more people "into" magic and mentalism, I believe less and less are performing it for pay at any point...
if a magician does magic in their act, and then throws in a couple of mentalism pieces, no matter how strong or perfectly performed, the majority of the audience will still go away thinking "great tricks" or "great magic"... to the audience, the magician is not putting pieces of mentalism or mind-reading, they will (because the person has established themself as a magician at the start) continue to label the performer as "a magician"...everything the audience saw that night will equate to magic and the possibility of any of it being real in any sense will not enter their head at all... i say all this, not counting any extremes... if a mentalism does mentalism in their act, and then throws in a couple of magic pieces, and doesn't change the presentation in any meaningful way - then, (apart from being stupid to do that) the audience will either not care, or will be confused because up until the magic happened, it was a *insert mentalism framework here - lets say devoted to telepathic communication* - and now the sponge balls are out... the magic clown tells a parent what word they picked by magic, because they are a magic clown...maybe the more serious they act, the funnier it is...if a mentalist does the same thing, but is already established, has performed well and consistently - then the comparison will not even enter the mind, surely... if a mentalist changes the presentation of what is (at heart) a magic trick so it fitted in with their framework, then it would depend on how convincing the performance was and the effect was...they may do this because they want (for example) give a demonstration of influence, done under high pressure in the real world - so they do it with two hands of poker...the mentalist wins time after time, or allows a certain person out of two to endlessly win... a card-sharp says he's so good at gambling, his sleight of hand is so good, so smooth, so invisible, he can do the same...and a magician lets people shuffle the cards at the beginning, and then as if by magic, he wins and he wins and he wins...its uncanny... a mentalist performs only mentalism and its a straight, clear line if their presentations and framework are consistent... some people will still see it as tricks, and some will still see it as the real thing, others don't care and just want to be entertained for the evening... inbetween all of this - are other sub-genres, people who believe we should try and change a life, remove a fear, whatever else - others play it tongue in cheek...bizarrism, story-tellers, gospel magicians, all kinds of stuff... if we want originality and for things to progress, (and I do not say this to try and upset, annoy or confuse anything) - I honestly believe we have to suffer - at least for a short while - a bit of trivialization...sometimes the plaster gets soaked off and falls off naturally, other times it gets ripped off suddenly... for mentalism to stay healthy - it needs the tradition and the cultural knowledge that goes along with it, the history, the respect...it also needs people prodding at it and experimenting... and sometimes it'll go horribly wrong - but I do think it'll remain intact...it will still stay healthy one way or the other...and then every now and again - something good will come out of it too... very briefly, I will touch upon readings - look how that has changed in some ways...and far, far, far for the better... if you wanted to be a reader, you had all kinds of stuff you could do - but some of it included some not very nice methods - and usually you had to be psychic (pretend or otherwise, but realistic to the punter) - or an intuitive or similar...things had to be a certain way...but then came along the character analysis style of doing it...and then the ways people like scott grossberg or enrique deliver it...there's an artistic edge to it at some angles, maybe a life-coach or empowerment feel to another edge...they are all different and add colour and texture... i am sure you would find that some of it came about through a natural calling or progression, other times it was just plain kicked around and shoved at with a stick until it became something else... and I've not even mentioned about personality and sharing things that you personally love in performing...though I do understand I am certainly not in any way someone to listen to - I'm just typing out my own personal thoughts on a forum...we all know what should be the whole of the law...
I've asked to be banned
|
|||||||||
mastermindreader 1949 - 2017 Seattle, WA 12586 Posts |
Iain- What is your response to the statement Mr. Caudel is endorsing that says those of us who believe magic and mentalism should not be mixed are "culturally and artistically ignorant?"
|
|||||||||
IAIN Eternal Order england 18807 Posts |
...on the one hand he's entitled to his opinion, but on the other hand I think its a p*ss-poor way of expressing his own personal view of things...
the example of an ACR followed by "mind-reading" in the same set means that because he's established himself as a magician from the get go...the "mind reading" is also a trick, and its something he's doing as a magician...the weight of it, the presentation of it, is all flavoured by "magic"...so the context from the audience's perspective is different whether he accepts it or not...
I've asked to be banned
|
|||||||||
IAIN Eternal Order england 18807 Posts |
And to expand further - I would say to have been able to witness Alexander perform back in the day, would have been a wondrous experience...and very far away from being "culturally and artistically ignorant"
I've asked to be banned
|
|||||||||
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Penny for your thoughts » » Multiple truths (5 Likes) | ||||||||||
Go to page [Previous] 1~2 |
[ Top of Page ] |
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2024 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.07 seconds requiring 5 database queries. |
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < |