On Jun 27, 2016, Salguod Nairb wrote:

Quote:

On Jun 27, 2016, acesover wrote:
I don't know Brian's experience with combat or spree shooters shootings in a social situation. But to be honest reading what he has to say I would say he has very little if any experience with any other than something he has read. I have zero experience with spree shooters or an attacker with a firearm in a social situation and hope I never have the experience.

On Jun 27, 2016, funsway wrote:

Quote:

On Jun 26, 2016, Dannydoyle wrote:
At 73 you should not carry a weapon.

no attack, Danny -- just wish you to clarify. Why should age be a criterion for gun carry?

Do you think a senior citizen is physically incapable of handling one properly?

Do you feel their judgement in a pressure situation will be poorer than that of a younger cohort?

Do you feel they have "less to protect" than a twenty year old and just pick off twirps for the fun of it?

What??

If age is somehow an important factor, it seems that all of the mass shooters of late have been in the 27-32 age group (those between age cohorts X and millennials)

So, wouldn't it make sense to ban gun ownership for people in that age group?

On Jun 27, 2016, acesover wrote:
If you did not say I am engaging a shooter please explain this as you composed. It no back pedaling would be appreciated:

On Jun 27, 2016, Tom Cutts wrote:

Quote:

On Jun 27, 2016, acesover wrote:
If you did not say I am engaging a shooter please explain this as you composed. It no back pedaling would be appreciated:

I have no problem making it as simple as possible for you, but you need to put something on the table in return. If you agree to admit that you shouldn't be carrying due to a lack of being able to assess a direct and logical line of thought by Brian, I will break down the three or four simple quotes necessary. It is a very simple and very direct line which was made and to which you are completely clueless. I fear when that happens in a live ammo situation you will again fail at assessment and make a poor decision possibly gravely endangering those around you.

My experience with firearms and my stance on the 2nd Amendment have nothing to do with your shortcomings of assessment. That is just a smoke screen attempt to divert attention.

On Jun 27, 2016, acesover wrote:
I imagine are both of them are anti gun and anything they say regarding a weapon for self defense is obviously biased because of their stance on firearms.

On Jun 27, 2016, Dannydoyle wrote:
I have found old people like yourself have never had a clue in 73 years.

And where is me having a fear of getting older coming from? Project much Methuselah?

See since you are old and losing comprehension skills let me explain. We are talking about here a spree killer, carjackings and such. That is not simply OWNING a gun but rather CARRYING one. To make it easier for you since that is obviously necessary, think of it as owning a car in your garage, and driving one in the street. I can't keep taking time to give you these examples you will have to try harder to keep up.

Your father dropping a mule deer at 84 years old has as much to do with this conversation as what he ate for breakfast that morning.

Go up a few posts and you will see that YOU RESPONDED to when I said (Should I yell all the time so you can hear me?)

"no attack, Danny -- just wish you to clarify. Why should age be a criterion for gun carry?

Do you think a senior citizen is physically incapable of handling one properly?

Do you feel their judgement in a pressure situation will be poorer than that of a younger cohort?

Do you feel they have "less to protect" than a twenty year old and just pick off twirps for the fun of it?

What??

If age is somehow an important factor, it seems that all of the mass shooters of late have been in the 27-32 age group (those between age cohorts X and millennials)

So, wouldn't it make sense to ban gun ownership for people in that age group?"

See how YOU shifted the goal posts as usual? Suddenly it is "gun ownership" and not a carry permit. By the way is the right to carry in the Constitution?

I know at your age your mind tends to drift and you forget things but don't you even remember your OWN POSTS? Or are they so bad that you want to be free from them as well?

Doing old things in new ways? No people have been doing the cranky old man thing for a long time. Hey that reminds me I keep meaning to ask you where is Waldorf?

On Jun 27, 2016, Tom Cutts wrote:

Quote:

On Jun 27, 2016, acesover wrote:
I imagine are both of them are anti gun and anything they say regarding a weapon for self defense is obviously biased because of their stance on firearms.

Classic bravado when you feel threatened, the kind that gets people killed.

That is quite an imagination. What things will you be imagining if gun fire breaks out?

On Jun 27, 2016, acesover wrote:

Quote:

On Jun 27, 2016, Dannydoyle wrote:
I have found old people like yourself have never had a clue in 73 years.

And where is me having a fear of getting older coming from? Project much Methuselah?

See since you are old and losing comprehension skills let me explain. We are talking about here a spree killer, carjackings and such. That is not simply OWNING a gun but rather CARRYING one. To make it easier for you since that is obviously necessary, think of it as owning a car in your garage, and driving one in the street. I can't keep taking time to give you these examples you will have to try harder to keep up.

Your father dropping a mule deer at 84 years old has as much to do with this conversation as what he ate for breakfast that morning.

Go up a few posts and you will see that YOU RESPONDED to when I said (Should I yell all the time so you can hear me?)

"no attack, Danny -- just wish you to clarify. Why should age be a criterion for gun carry?

Do you think a senior citizen is physically incapable of handling one properly?

Do you feel their judgement in a pressure situation will be poorer than that of a younger cohort?

Do you feel they have "less to protect" than a twenty year old and just pick off twirps for the fun of it?

What??

If age is somehow an important factor, it seems that all of the mass shooters of late have been in the 27-32 age group (those between age cohorts X and millennials)

So, wouldn't it make sense to ban gun ownership for people in that age group?"

See how YOU shifted the goal posts as usual? Suddenly it is "gun ownership" and not a carry permit. By the way is the right to carry in the Constitution?

I know at your age your mind tends to drift and you forget things but don't you even remember your OWN POSTS? Or are they so bad that you want to be free from them as well?

Doing old things in new ways? No people have been doing the cranky old man thing for a long time. Hey that reminds me I keep meaning to ask you where is Waldorf?

Danny,

You are in deep water and you are drowning in this discussion. You are trying to grab onto anything that floats and it is not working. Many of your discussions in the past have made sense and some others not so much. This is definitely going in the group of not so much.

You can play the age card if you wish but that shows nothing but desperation on your part. Your using my age of 73 as a reason for not allowing me to carry a firearm is probably one of the most asinine statements ever made by anyone on this forum. You definitely stepped over the line this time.

I am still quite capable of running my businesses despite my old age of 73 which should according to you limit my abilities. Danny seriously, get a life my good man. I can only hope others treat you with the respect "that you deserve" when you reach my age an are judged by your abilities and not by your age. Trust me I am not the person who has fallen down and cannot get up. That may be your stereotype of older people. Again get real my good man. You sound very bigoted when considering the capabilities of older individuals. Just out of curiosity Danny, what age should we take the firearms away from people? You must have an age in mind.

On Jun 27, 2016, Dannydoyle wrote:

Quote:

On Jun 27, 2016, acesover wrote:

Quote:

On Jun 27, 2016, Dannydoyle wrote:
I have found old people like yourself have never had a clue in 73 years.

And where is me having a fear of getting older coming from? Project much Methuselah?

See since you are old and losing comprehension skills let me explain. We are talking about here a spree killer, carjackings and such. That is not simply OWNING a gun but rather CARRYING one. To make it easier for you since that is obviously necessary, think of it as owning a car in your garage, and driving one in the street. I can't keep taking time to give you these examples you will have to try harder to keep up.

Your father dropping a mule deer at 84 years old has as much to do with this conversation as what he ate for breakfast that morning.

Go up a few posts and you will see that YOU RESPONDED to when I said (Should I yell all the time so you can hear me?)

"no attack, Danny -- just wish you to clarify. Why should age be a criterion for gun carry?

Do you think a senior citizen is physically incapable of handling one properly?

Do you feel their judgement in a pressure situation will be poorer than that of a younger cohort?

Do you feel they have "less to protect" than a twenty year old and just pick off twirps for the fun of it?

What??

If age is somehow an important factor, it seems that all of the mass shooters of late have been in the 27-32 age group (those between age cohorts X and millennials)

So, wouldn't it make sense to ban gun ownership for people in that age group?"

See how YOU shifted the goal posts as usual? Suddenly it is "gun ownership" and not a carry permit. By the way is the right to carry in the Constitution?

I know at your age your mind tends to drift and you forget things but don't you even remember your OWN POSTS? Or are they so bad that you want to be free from them as well?

Doing old things in new ways? No people have been doing the cranky old man thing for a long time. Hey that reminds me I keep meaning to ask you where is Waldorf?

Danny,

You are in deep water and you are drowning in this discussion. You are trying to grab onto anything that floats and it is not working. Many of your discussions in the past have made sense and some others not so much. This is definitely going in the group of not so much.

You can play the age card if you wish but that shows nothing but desperation on your part. Your using my age of 73 as a reason for not allowing me to carry a firearm is probably one of the most asinine statements ever made by anyone on this forum. You definitely stepped over the line this time.

I am still quite capable of running my businesses despite my old age of 73 which should according to you limit my abilities. Danny seriously, get a life my good man. I can only hope others treat you with the respect "that you deserve" when you reach my age an are judged by your abilities and not by your age. Trust me I am not the person who has fallen down and cannot get up. That may be your stereotype of older people. Again get real my good man. You sound very bigoted when considering the capabilities of older individuals. Just out of curiosity Danny, what age should we take the firearms away from people? You must have an age in mind.

When someone has trouble following conversations like you and funsway maybe it is time to reexamine if they should have guns or drive or do surgery and so forth.

Well at least 1/2 of my posts make sense. That puts me ahead of you where none do. So I have that going for me. They make perfect sense, you just don't have the ability to keep up.

Oh and let me guess you are one of those old people who fall into the logical trap of if you agree with something it makes sense?

I LOVE when people say "get a life" or some such thing. It just says a lot more about what you obviously do not know.

And we ARE judging you by your abilities. The critical thinking ones you seem to lack that would go into thinking of when to use a gun. But let me guess just like funsway you are the best in the world at it right?

On Jun 27, 2016, stoneunhinged wrote:
I myself (I am only 53) continually practice with nunchucks.

I feel extremely safe.

On Jun 27, 2016, acesover wrote:

Quote:

On Jun 27, 2016, stoneunhinged wrote:
I myself (I am only 53) continually practice with nunchucks.

I feel extremely safe.

Quite honestly if at bad breath distance I have my pistol holstered and you have the nunchucks out and attack me ... I am most likely a goner.

On Jun 28, 2016, Slim King wrote:
L@@K ... Good Guys with Guns STOP Bad Guys with Guns ... TODAY!!!!!!
http://www.wcsh6.com/news/local/augusta-......57256957

On Jun 28, 2016, acesover wrote:

Quote:

On Jun 28, 2016, Slim King wrote:
L@@K ... Good Guys with Guns STOP Bad Guys with Guns ... TODAY!!!!!!
http://www.wcsh6.com/news/local/augusta-......57256957

Of course this does not count because no minorities got killed by a white bad person so it is not news worthy for the left press. Also after reading the names and nick names I am sure it is nothing but racial profiling. (Sarcasm). These were just a couple of guys fooling around with illegal drugs and dealing and breaking probation along with illegal use of firearms and are now being picked on. This should be banned from all news media.

You should be ashamed for bringing this up slim. (sarcasm).