|
|
Go to page [Previous] 1~2~3~4~5~6~7 [Next] | ||||||||||
NeilS Inner circle 3225 Posts |
I really am glad so many are appreciating Underhanded. It is such a brilliant and effective method and, while I have not ditched certain peek wallets, CT and billet manipulations are (thankfully) for me a thing of the past.
In using Underhanded I have found a very small dab of fanning powder is very effective, especially when using my own non-glossy business cards or plain cards (bought from Rymans in the UK.) This ensures everything goes smoothly, in more ways than one. Neil |
|||||||||
Mr. F Loyal user Kentucky 247 Posts |
Videoman,
I too always struggled with the move in question. That is what led to the alternate handling that is discussed in “The P**** P***” section of the book. I find it to be significantly easier and more deceptive. There is also a two-stage handling discussed in that section that eliminates the problem altogether. Feel free to contact me if you need further clarification. Thanks, Josh |
|||||||||
videoman Inner circle 6732 Posts |
Hey Josh, yes I had overlooked that section. Thanks for pointing it out. Great handling for it.
|
|||||||||
Atlas Inner circle 3103 1277 Posts |
I have to know - has anyone using Underhanded tried the Epic Triple Fail yet?!?! I have to believe the answer is no, because if anyone had, there'd definitely be some noise here about it!
Seriously - someone let me know how it went down for you. All the best, Atlas |
|||||||||
Stunninger Inner circle 2819 Posts |
Still haven't tried the Epic Triple Fail yet, but did re-read that section of the manuscript and will give it a try soon.
Was tempted to buy one of the new peek envelopes released in the last few days (it does look very nice), but was able to resist the temptation thanks to Underhanded. So I continue to save money thanks to my investment in Underhanded. |
|||||||||
Stunninger Inner circle 2819 Posts |
Quote:
On Sep 26, 2018, Atlas wrote: So I FINALLY tried the EPIC Triple Fail. I guess I was reluctant to fail. But now that I've tried it, there is no turning back. Not only does the Epic Triple Fail pack a wallop, it makes for a much more entertaining experience. Wonderful thinking here, Atlas. |
|||||||||
Stunninger Inner circle 2819 Posts |
Oh, and something else worth noting. I had given my spectator the stack of cards to hold while I attempted to re-create her drawing. Instead of holding the stack, she set it down.
After the routine, a few moments went by, and she picked up the stack of cards to find her drawing, which was right in the middle of the stack where it should be. |
|||||||||
Stunninger Inner circle 2819 Posts |
Recently I discovered that having the spectator write on the glossy side of the double blank business card makes the workings easier, smoother. If you have dry hands you may want to give this a try.
When using a sharpie, no issue having them write on the glossy side. |
|||||||||
Seth speaks Inner circle New Mexico 1249 Posts |
I’ve been using Underhanded a lot since first learning it last year, and I think it is tops! Two things I’ve discovered—it works just fine without having to hand the card to the spec before placing it in the stack... I generally just set it down briefly and then put it back in. Also—I find there is generally no need for the “get ready” when doing the alternative move that folks are saying looks more natural. I do it both ways without much difficulty. Two thumbs up for me!
|
|||||||||
NeilS Inner circle 3225 Posts |
Quote:
On Apr 4, 2019, Seth speaks wrote: Thanks for your thoughts on this. Underhanded is a real delight and worker. |
|||||||||
Stunninger Inner circle 2819 Posts |
Quote:
On Apr 4, 2019, Seth speaks wrote: This is a great idea, Seth! Thank you for sharing. |
|||||||||
Sudo Nimh Inner circle 1867 Posts |
Or...you could skip the entirely illogical moment of removing the signed card from the bottom altogether (because it is entirely illogical) by supposedly cutting the stack to center it. After all, if you actually wanted to lose it "for real", that's what you'd do. So simply give the cards a single cut - a "HaLo cut" specifically. It's a genuine cut, but retains the bottom card in place. Get your peek as you pocket or place the stack of business cards away. Short, fast, and simple... and exactly what you'd do in real life without any illogical moves. Removing the signed card from bottom to insert it into the center of the stack only a moment later, is not only illogical and time-consuming, but it draws attention to something that should be a "non-moment". Just cut the darn stack of cards and be done with it.
|
|||||||||
Atlas Inner circle 3103 1277 Posts |
Stunninger - I'm glad you finally tried the Epic Triple Fail! There really isn't any going back once you have - it gets the best reactions!
And I'm glad Seth and NeilS are also enjoying Underhanded! As far as Sudo's idea, that's a pretty smooth peek! A HaLo cut and glimpse as you pocket. I'll stick with Underhanded, though for the reasons I outlined in my post earlier: Quote:
On Aug 10, 2018, Atlas wrote: All the best, Atlas |
|||||||||
Stunninger Inner circle 2819 Posts |
I'll stick with Underhanded, too, for those same 3 reasons. Love the freedom of #1, but #2 & #3 make Underhanded as good as I've seen.
Plus, since I've started using Underhanded, I STILL have not bought another wallet!! Tempted a couple of times, but was able to resist the temptation |
|||||||||
Ori Ascher New user 85 Posts |
This p**k actually makes me wanna perform it all the time.
So easy to do, the angles are very easy to manage and the p**k is clear as hell. The best thing for me, is that you finish super clean. Recommended. |
|||||||||
Mr. F Loyal user Kentucky 247 Posts |
I’m so glad to see people are still enjoying and using Underhanded. I consider myself a much better performer than creator, and the thought of releasing this p**k never even crossed my mind. Underhanded was developed through much real world trial and error to alleviate issues I encountered when using previously available methods. I have used Underhanded literally hundreds of times, and I assure you that, when done correctly, nothing is perceived as illogical.
|
|||||||||
Kassim New user 58 Posts |
Is anyone still using this peek out of curiosity?
|
|||||||||
The Unmasked Magician Inner circle If only I didn't have a wife and a kid I would have MUCH more than 2645 Posts |
Interesting question. In discovering them we tend to fall in love with new moves, ideas, etc. The biggest test is to check back after a few years. I'd be very interested to hear some answers from those who bought this! Do you still use it? If not, what did you replace it with? Thanks in advance!
Please check regularly if you are becoming the type of magician Jerry Seinfeld jokes about. (This applies to mentalists as well.)
|
|||||||||
Kassim New user 58 Posts |
Quote:
On May 27, 2022, The Unmasked Magician wrote: Exactly my thoughts. Everyone was saying how great this peek was when it first came out. Curious to see if people still think the same. Personally I didn't like it and found it quite illogical. But then again, it did give me ideas for other things which is worth it to me. |
|||||||||
The Unmasked Magician Inner circle If only I didn't have a wife and a kid I would have MUCH more than 2645 Posts |
Ah, tnx!! Interesting to hear!
Please check regularly if you are becoming the type of magician Jerry Seinfeld jokes about. (This applies to mentalists as well.)
|
|||||||||
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Latest and Greatest? » » Underhanded by Atlas Brookings and Joshua Fletcher (46 Likes) | ||||||||||
Go to page [Previous] 1~2~3~4~5~6~7 [Next] |
[ Top of Page ] |
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2024 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.03 seconds requiring 5 database queries. |
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < |