The Magic Café
Username:
Password:
[ Lost Password ]
  [ Forgot Username ]
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Latest and Greatest? » » Picasso Pro App ||ProMystic x Ellusionist (195 Likes) Printer Friendly Version

 Go to page [Previous]  1~2~3..8~9~10~11~12..23~24~25 [Next]
Schism
View Profile
Regular user
122 Posts

Profile of Schism
App is standalone.
dooblehorn
View Profile
Inner circle
Pittsburg, CA
1901 Posts

Profile of dooblehorn
Quote:
On May 1, 2020, egoli wrote:
Any update when templates will be available? My drawing and colouring are terrible. Or can someone PM me with a coloured-in stickman or house? - that would be fantastic and very much appreciated.

Many thanks in advance

Ed

Ed, I'm with you. Awaiting templates.
avimag51
View Profile
Regular user
131 Posts

Profile of avimag51
Quote:
On May 1, 2020, Schism wrote:
App is standalone.


thank you.

i read some posts and I understand that some sort of peek is needed , but if you had a prediction from advance , why peek is needed ?
is the performence go like this ?
performer : please choose a color .
( performer peeks the chosen color )
performer : ok, use that color to paint the hat.
and so on....
if that the routine , I think it will be quite obvious to the spectator whats going on , and that an app is involved.

or I missed the whole thing ?
NeilS
View Profile
Inner circle
2384 Posts

Profile of NeilS
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, avimag51 wrote:
Quote:
On May 1, 2020, Schism wrote:
App is standalone.


thank you.

i read some posts and I understand that some sort of peek is needed , but if you had a prediction from advance , why peek is needed ?
is the performence go like this ?
performer : please choose a color .
( performer peeks the chosen color )
performer : ok, use that color to paint the hat.
and so on....
if that the routine , I think it will be quite obvious to the spectator whats going on , and that an app is involved.

or I missed the whole thing ?


Have you seen Peter Turner's performance in which he emailed out his prediction well in advance? It was seriously impressive.
pegasus
View Profile
Inner circle
United Kingdom
8259 Posts

Profile of pegasus
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, NeilS wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, avimag51 wrote:
Quote:
On May 1, 2020, Schism wrote:
App is standalone.


thank you.

i read some posts and I understand that some sort of peek is needed , but if you had a prediction from advance , why peek is needed ?
is the performence go like this ?
performer : please choose a color .
( performer peeks the chosen color )
performer : ok, use that color to paint the hat.
and so on....
if that the routine , I think it will be quite obvious to the spectator whats going on , and that an app is involved.

or I missed the whole thing ?


Have you seen Peter Turner's performance in which he emailed out his prediction well in advance? It was seriously impressive.


Where is that performance?
avimag51
View Profile
Regular user
131 Posts

Profile of avimag51
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, NeilS wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, avimag51 wrote:
Quote:
On May 1, 2020, Schism wrote:
App is standalone.


thank you.

i read some posts and I understand that some sort of peek is needed , but if you had a prediction from advance , why peek is needed ?
is the performence go like this ?
performer : please choose a color .
( performer peeks the chosen color )
performer : ok, use that color to paint the hat.
and so on....
if that the routine , I think it will be quite obvious to the spectator whats going on , and that an app is involved.

or I missed the whole thing ?


Have you seen Peter Turner's performance in which he emailed out his prediction well in advance? It was seriously impressive.


i didn't see Peter Turner's performance . the issue is not the prediction , if its emailed from advance or draw on a piece of paper from advance. the issue is how the rourine is going . if its like I wrote above that spectator choose a color and you said to him , with this color please paint the hat or the shirt ( of course after you peeked ) than the method is too obvious and surley every one will suspect that a peek app is involved.
avimag51
View Profile
Regular user
131 Posts

Profile of avimag51
By the way this app reminds me an old app that I have . its called in my Iphone " PsiPad " . I don't know if that the name in the store cause I don't find it any more by this name . this app has a drawing pad that you can draw any thing you want, then you give your phone to the spectatore and tell him to paint the object any way he wants. ( there are 10 colors pencils to choose ). you can peek whats he does simultaneity , and the good thing is that you can peek it in your smart watch ( Apple ).
garyogden1957
View Profile
Loyal user
262 Posts

Profile of garyogden1957
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, pegasus wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, NeilS wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, avimag51 wrote:
Quote:
On May 1, 2020, Schism wrote:
App is standalone.


thank you.

i read some posts and I understand that some sort of peek is needed , but if you had a prediction from advance , why peek is needed ?
is the performence go like this ?
performer : please choose a color .
( performer peeks the chosen color )
performer : ok, use that color to paint the hat.
and so on....
if that the routine , I think it will be quite obvious to the spectator whats going on , and that an app is involved.

or I missed the whole thing ?


Have you seen Peter Turner's performance in which he emailed out his prediction well in advance? It was seriously impressive.


Where is that performance?


Its is here https://www.ellusionist.com/picasso-pro.html
scroll down the page.
godan65
View Profile
New user
9 Posts

Profile of godan65
Yes, an amazing routine and performance of Peter. It shows how you can add layers of deception through clever construction and precise talking. Love it 😀
avimag51
View Profile
Regular user
131 Posts

Profile of avimag51
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, garyogden1957 wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, pegasus wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, NeilS wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, avimag51 wrote:
Quote:
On May 1, 2020, Schism wrote:
App is standalone.


thank you.

i read some posts and I understand that some sort of peek is needed , but if you had a prediction from advance , why peek is needed ?
is the performence go like this ?
performer : please choose a color .
( performer peeks the chosen color )
performer : ok, use that color to paint the hat.
and so on....
if that the routine , I think it will be quite obvious to the spectator whats going on , and that an app is involved.

or I missed the whole thing ?


Have you seen Peter Turner's performance in which he emailed out his prediction well in advance? It was seriously impressive.


Where is that performance?


Its is here https://www.ellusionist.com/picasso-pro.html
scroll down the page.


i saw the performence , and its like I thought . pick a color , now with that color draw the windows. pick another color , now with that one draw the door. and so on...
too obvious .
the only thing I didn't catch is how the number ( 22 ) is match.
patapon
View Profile
Regular user
Malaysia
136 Posts

Profile of patapon
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, avimag51 wrote:
Quote:
On May 1, 2020, Schism wrote:
App is standalone.


thank you.

i read some posts and I understand that some sort of peek is needed , but if you had a prediction from advance , why peek is needed ?
is the performence go like this ?
performer : please choose a color .
( performer peeks the chosen color )

performer : ok, use that color to paint the hat.
and so on....
if that the routine , I think it will be quite obvious to the spectator whats going on , and that an app is involved.

or I missed the whole thing ?



I just purchased this yesterday, and I will say this... it doesn't do the magic in a way that would make it "less obvious", so you MUST have a very strong script to make it "less obvious" so that your Spec would not suspect what is going on, or that an App is involved.

Peter's demo is a great example of how he made his Spec feel that he had a totally free choice of which object to draw, which colour to choose and which part of the object to fill with that chosen colour.

In summary, my opinion is that if you treat this as a "self-working trick", then yes, there is real danger that your Spec will know what's going on, and an App/some tech is involved. However, if you treat this as a tool, and understand that it needs a GREAT script, then you will blow your Specs' minds!
avimag51
View Profile
Regular user
131 Posts

Profile of avimag51
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, godan65 wrote:
Yes, an amazing routine and performance of Peter. It shows how you can add layers of deception through clever construction and precise talking. Love it 😀


whats so clever about that ? any little wise spectator will understand that you peeked the color they choose , and tell him to draw the item ( window , door , trees ...) match to your " prediction ".
like I wrote , I alraedy have an app that can make quite similar routine ( but better to my opinion ) with 10 colors. ( not with an previously prediction , but as simultaneously mind reading ) . an the peek can be done in the Smart watch ).
avimag51
View Profile
Regular user
131 Posts

Profile of avimag51
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, patapon wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, avimag51 wrote:
Quote:
On May 1, 2020, Schism wrote:
App is standalone.


thank you.

i read some posts and I understand that some sort of peek is needed , but if you had a prediction from advance , why peek is needed ?
is the performence go like this ?
performer : please choose a color .
( performer peeks the chosen color )

performer : ok, use that color to paint the hat.
and so on....
if that the routine , I think it will be quite obvious to the spectator whats going on , and that an app is involved.

or I missed the whole thing ?



I just purchased this yesterday, and I will say this... it doesn't do the magic in a way that would make it "less obvious", so you MUST have a very strong script to make it "less obvious" so that your Spec would not suspect what is going on, or that an App is involved.

Peter's demo is a great example of how he made his Spec feel that he had a totally free choice of which object to draw, which colour to choose and which part of the object to fill with that chosen colour.

In summary, my opinion is that if you treat this as a "self-working trick", then yes, there is real danger that your Spec will know what's going on, and an App/some tech is involved. However, if you treat this as a tool, and understand that it needs a GREAT script, then you will blow your Specs' minds!


please read my comment to godan65.
amirb401
View Profile
Regular user
131 Posts

Profile of amirb401
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, avimag51 wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, patapon wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, avimag51 wrote:
Quote:
On May 1, 2020, Schism wrote:
App is standalone.


thank you.

i read some posts and I understand that some sort of peek is needed , but if you had a prediction from advance , why peek is needed ?
is the performence go like this ?
performer : please choose a color .
( performer peeks the chosen color )

performer : ok, use that color to paint the hat.
and so on....
if that the routine , I think it will be quite obvious to the spectator whats going on , and that an app is involved.

or I missed the whole thing ?



I just purchased this yesterday, and I will say this... it doesn't do the magic in a way that would make it "less obvious", so you MUST have a very strong script to make it "less obvious" so that your Spec would not suspect what is going on, or that an App is involved.

Peter's demo is a great example of how he made his Spec feel that he had a totally free choice of which object to draw, which colour to choose and which part of the object to fill with that chosen colour.

In summary, my opinion is that if you treat this as a "self-working trick", then yes, there is real danger that your Spec will know what's going on, and an App/some tech is involved. However, if you treat this as a tool, and understand that it needs a GREAT script, then you will blow your Specs' minds!


please read my comment to godan65.


Did anyone forced you to buy it?
If you don't like it, continue scrolling, I don't get what you want. one can think its clever or good, if you feel like this isn't your cup of tea then just continue.
Like what the hell
avimag51
View Profile
Regular user
131 Posts

Profile of avimag51
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, amirb401 wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, avimag51 wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, patapon wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, avimag51 wrote:
Quote:
On May 1, 2020, Schism wrote:
App is standalone.


thank you.

i read some posts and I understand that some sort of peek is needed , but if you had a prediction from advance , why peek is needed ?
is the performence go like this ?
performer : please choose a color .
( performer peeks the chosen color )

performer : ok, use that color to paint the hat.
and so on....
if that the routine , I think it will be quite obvious to the spectator whats going on , and that an app is involved.

or I missed the whole thing ?



I just purchased this yesterday, and I will say this... it doesn't do the magic in a way that would make it "less obvious", so you MUST have a very strong script to make it "less obvious" so that your Spec would not suspect what is going on, or that an App is involved.

Peter's demo is a great example of how he made his Spec feel that he had a totally free choice of which object to draw, which colour to choose and which part of the object to fill with that chosen colour.

In summary, my opinion is that if you treat this as a "self-working trick", then yes, there is real danger that your Spec will know what's going on, and an App/some tech is involved. However, if you treat this as a tool, and understand that it needs a GREAT script, then you will blow your Specs' minds!


please read my comment to godan65.


Did anyone forced you to buy it?
If you don't like it, continue scrolling, I don't get what you want. one can think its clever or good, if you feel like this isn't your cup of tea then just continue.
Like what the hell


i didn't buy it .
i just wanted to understand whats so smart about that , maybe I missed something .( and I don't )
be happy with your purchase .
garyogden1957
View Profile
Loyal user
262 Posts

Profile of garyogden1957
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, avimag51 wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, patapon wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, avimag51 wrote:
Quote:
On May 1, 2020, Schism wrote:
App is standalone.


thank you.

i read some posts and I understand that some sort of peek is needed , but if you had a prediction from advance , why peek is needed ?
is the performence go like this ?

I get the impression that some of you haven't even bought this effect and making your own minds up about it.
For those of us who HAVE bought it you will know it does not rely just on peeks you can do it totally without peeks.

performer : please choose a color .
( performer peeks the chosen color )

performer : ok, use that color to paint the hat.
and so on....
if that the routine , I think it will be quite obvious to the spectator whats going on , and that an app is involved.

or I missed the whole thing ?



I just purchased this yesterday, and I will say this... it doesn't do the magic in a way that would make it "less obvious", so you MUST have a very strong script to make it "less obvious" so that your Spec would not suspect what is going on, or that an App is involved.

Peter's demo is a great example of how he made his Spec feel that he had a totally free choice of which object to draw, which colour to choose and which part of the object to fill with that chosen colour.

In summary, my opinion is that if you treat this as a "self-working trick", then yes, there is real danger that your Spec will know what's going on, and an App/some tech is involved. However, if you treat this as a tool, and understand that it needs a GREAT script, then you will blow your Specs' minds!


please read my comment to godan65.
garyogden1957
View Profile
Loyal user
262 Posts

Profile of garyogden1957
I saw the performence , and its like I thought . pick a color , now with that color draw the windows. pick another color , now with that one draw the door. and so on...
too obvious .
the only thing I didn't catch is how the number ( 22 ) is match. [/quote]

that's the magic and again if you had bought it you would know the answer!
swifthand
View Profile
New user
65 Posts

Profile of swifthand
Quote:
On May 1, 2020, Nathan Alexander wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 30, 2020, JamieD wrote:
Those interested in doing so, you can buy a separate domain, normally for very little money. Then divert the apps domain to the one purchased and enable masking. This means, they'll go to your custom domain and it will display that and not the one that comes with the app. The only issue with this is, the Picasso for some reason has the name of the website at the top of the sketch page so your personal address will contradict that of the actual app. Just food for thought! Smile

Jamie Daws


Hey Jamie - I loved this idea and did it. I'm not opposed to using the regular domain, but with my new one, the drawing doesn't fill the whole page like it does with going the normal, provided URL (with your ID) route. How about you? not sure why...


Hey Nathan, this was the first thing I did, you have to use 'cloaked web forwarding' this normally depends on your host as to the iframe code they produce, the drawing fills the whole page for me but as Jamie mentioned the title of the website suddenly becomes tiny for some reason... I personally think they should take the title off altogether. I prefer the idea of having my own domain and forwarding as it won't be long before people type in the name of the picassos domain and ellusionist website will pop up.


On another note, does any one know the reason why they haven't secure the page using https? I have heard he covered this in the instruction video but I have watched them all twice and have missed his explanation for not making the website secure? Anyone here know the reason?
Arielhamui
View Profile
New user
Buenos Aires, Argentina
48 Posts

Profile of Arielhamui
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, avimag51 wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, amirb401 wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, avimag51 wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, patapon wrote:
Quote:
On May 2, 2020, avimag51 wrote:
Quote:
On May 1, 2020, Schism wrote:
App is standalone.


thank you.

i read some posts and I understand that some sort of peek is needed , but if you had a prediction from advance , why peek is needed ?
is the performence go like this ?
performer : please choose a color .
( performer peeks the chosen color )

performer : ok, use that color to paint the hat.
and so on....
if that the routine , I think it will be quite obvious to the spectator whats going on , and that an app is involved.

or I missed the whole thing ?



I just purchased this yesterday, and I will say this... it doesn't do the magic in a way that would make it "less obvious", so you MUST have a very strong script to make it "less obvious" so that your Spec would not suspect what is going on, or that an App is involved.

Peter's demo is a great example of how he made his Spec feel that he had a totally free choice of which object to draw, which colour to choose and which part of the object to fill with that chosen colour.

In summary, my opinion is that if you treat this as a "self-working trick", then yes, there is real danger that your Spec will know what's going on, and an App/some tech is involved. However, if you treat this as a tool, and understand that it needs a GREAT script, then you will blow your Specs' minds!


please read my comment to godan65.


Did anyone forced you to buy it?
If you don't like it, continue scrolling, I don't get what you want. one can think its clever or good, if you feel like this isn't your cup of tea then just continue.
Like what the hell


i didn't buy it .
i just wanted to understand whats so smart about that , maybe I missed something .( and I don't )
be happy with your purchase .


I think you are thinking as a magician...

Color Match was a best seller for years! And tou know why? Because is an amazing efect and give excelent reactions to people!
Any trick you want to perform... in order to be strong... you ned to give a strong performance, with a good script and an amazing presentation.
This trick have many many potential ideas and its fine if you don't see it. But start thinking less as a magician and more as a layman
garyogden1957
View Profile
Loyal user
262 Posts

Profile of garyogden1957
I asked before but no reply does this app (Android) auto update or do you have to do something?
The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Latest and Greatest? » » Picasso Pro App ||ProMystic x Ellusionist (195 Likes)
 Go to page [Previous]  1~2~3..8~9~10~11~12..23~24~25 [Next]
X
[ Top of Page ]
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2020 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved.
This page was created in 0.3 seconds requiring 5 database queries.
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café
are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic.
> Privacy Statement <

ROTFL Billions and billions served! ROTFL