|
|
|
|||
| Go to page [Previous] 1~2~3~4~5~6~7 [Next] | ||||||||||
fcchief1 Loyal user 259 Posts 
|
Has anyone PM'd Joel and asked about the missing file he mentions in the video and how to handle the "5" dispute, since Joel said 1,2,3,4,or 5. I messaged 6 days ago but still no response.
|
|||||||||
loudini1972 New user Central New Jersey 95 Posts
|
He said he was going to message me as well about how to handle #5 but I haven't heard back as of yet??
|
|||||||||
John McLaughlin Veteran user Gloucester, Massachusetts 393 Posts
|
Anyone have an out for the first number and the last number? I hare having to correct the spectator with the “I said between” line. I do like the book solution that takes care of the first number. Two ideas I have, both are probably going way overboard. One is using the SVPD, as an old detective log with notes on each suspect, though I doubt I could age one enough to be convincing. Second idea is to buy a second set. Giving you more options. I haven’t though about placement yet if I do that, and the drawback is it won’t be examinable. Just some random brainstorming. .
...NSA John McLaughlin, not CIA John McLaughlin
|
|||||||||
|
Martin Pulman Inner circle London 3399 Posts
|
Quote:
On Oct 22, 2020, John McLaughlin wrote: Are you saying you can't choose one or five for the first number? |
|||||||||
|
John McLaughlin Veteran user Gloucester, Massachusetts 393 Posts
|
Sorry I need to move my post this should by under the collector trick just released from Alakzamm
...NSA John McLaughlin, not CIA John McLaughlin
|
|||||||||
Last Laugh Inner circle Grass Valley, California 3498 Posts
|
Quote:
On Oct 22, 2020, Martin Pulman wrote: One isn't a problem and it's covered in the instructions. 5 is the problematic one (as there aren't numbers 53-59 in the deck).
My Mentalism Podcast:
The Mystery Arts Podcast Check out my products! Direct from me (PW: cassidy) On Penguin Magic |
|||||||||
|
Martin Pulman Inner circle London 3399 Posts
|
Quote:
On Oct 22, 2020, Last Laugh wrote: I knew five was an issue but I was surprised at the suggestion that one was also problematic, but they were referring to a completely different trick, I see! |
|||||||||
|
fcchief1 Loyal user 259 Posts
|
Over 2 weeks and still no reply from Joel on #5 and on the supposed text that was suppose to accompany the trick, he just disappeared it seems.
|
|||||||||
|
EZrhythm Inner circle Only three EZ payments for a PDF of my 1855 Posts
|
Quote:
On Oct 22, 2020, John McLaughlin wrote: Invisible Deck
How many magicians does it take to change a lightbulb? Regardless, for magicians darkness is a time for d'lite.
|
|||||||||
thecromulent Veteran user Brooklyn, NY 390 Posts
|
I'm tempted to make this up with a one-way forcing deck, with a contrasting color (so, all KD with a 6C force card). It seems like that might be even stronger. Something about the blank deck suggests that the faces may have disappeared, or been "wiped away." A deck of repeated yet different cards implies that they were always printed that way. I don't know--seems like a small point, but it might make for a good ending.
|
|||||||||
|
Craig Petty V.I.P. UK 2325 Posts
|
Hey guys. I have to say this is a brilliant routine. Simply awesome.
I reviewed it on the latest episode of my review show. I performed the routine in full. Both myself and Ryland gave it 100%. It’s such a great commercial working routine. Here’s the link to the show with the review. Let me know what you think. https://youtu.be/OEAk--2uC5A |
|||||||||
|
jimesw Special user 675 Posts
|
Craig, you have given the wrong youtube link. We all learnt a lot about Cathrin's youtube set up though
|
|||||||||
|
Martin Pulman Inner circle London 3399 Posts
|
Quote:
On Nov 19, 2020, jimesw wrote: Indeed. I wondered why Craig had linked us to a video of a young blonde woman in hot pants demonstrating how she films herself at home. I was hoping she was going to tell us what to do if the first spectator names the number 'five'. |
|||||||||
|
Magic KL Inner circle 2571 Posts
|
Quote:
On Nov 19, 2020, Martin Pulman wrote: Haha. |
|||||||||
|
Craig Petty V.I.P. UK 2325 Posts
|
Lol! I’m a giant raving muppet!!!
She’s my favourite YouTuber (you can guess why!!) Anyway Instacann is awesome. Here’s the link to the review. Sorry guys. https://youtu.be/8R10xXfdVbI |
|||||||||
|
Philippe Special user 776 Posts
|
Any contact re the ‘5’ issue anyone?
|
|||||||||
|
Mr. Dural Loyal user 273 Posts
|
Quote:
On Nov 24, 2020, Philippe wrote: Why is this even an issue ? Just say : There are 52 cards in the deck. I would like this experiment to involve both of you...so you will think of a number under 5, and you think of a number over 5." |
|||||||||
|
reignofsound Inner circle Glasgow, UK 2200 Posts
|
Don't have this but could you not ask first person
Number between 1 and 4 Second person 5 and 9 Seems simple enough as there are only 52 cards. |
|||||||||
|
Martin Pulman Inner circle London 3399 Posts
|
Once you start drawing too much attention to the number choosing process or the card choosing process then any CAAN or ACAAN is pretty useless. The legend of the Berglas Effect grew because of the impossibly clean nature of the effect. Once you stray too far from that it becomes almost pointless.
|
|||||||||
|
Nikodemus Inner circle 1174 Posts
|
Quote:
On Nov 24, 2020, reignofsound wrote: I don't have this either, but I have a pretty good idea of how most of it works. Which means you do NOT want to offer the second spec the choice of 5-9; you need it to be 6-9. Also you definitely don't want to draw attention to the selection process by quibbling over the definition of "between" 1 and 5. (And making yourself seem like a bit of a d**k). My solution would be to ask for the numbers exactly as Joel does. Then IF the first spec says 5, wait till you get the number from the second spec. Then just act like you made a silly mistake - "Oh bother, that makes 56. There are only 52 in the deck! Doh! Can you give me a number from 1 to 4 instead?" With this approach, you manage the 2nd spec's decision before you re-frame the 1st spec's options. |
|||||||||
| The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Latest and Greatest? » » InstaCAAN : Smoother than your grannies chip pan (25 Likes) | ||||||||||
| Go to page [Previous] 1~2~3~4~5~6~7 [Next] | ||||||||||
Posted: Oct 21, 2020 07:00 pm 
X
| [ Top of Page ] |
|
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2024 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.03 seconds requiring 5 database queries. |
|
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement < 
|