On Oct 10, 2020, Dannydoyle wrote:
Do you REALLY think the Christie people don't have the answers you're demanding as if you somehow are entitled? Hate has you blind.

And how is it you think you can say "that's not what hairbrush"? Again you're sphere of information is painfully small but you make grand pronouncements based on your hatred alone and biased reports. Talk about my cheerleading and you have nothing but blind hatred. And I'm not cheering him at all. Just being factual and honest. Sorry that throw a wrench into stuff.

What exactly is his reckless and selfish irresponsibility?

On Oct 10, 2020, Francois Lagrange wrote:
For a guy who’s not defending him, you spend a lot of time doing it and denying it.

Anyway, it is a basic, crucial question and one the White House refuses to answer: When was President Donald Trump’s last negative test for the coronavirus before he tested positive?

If anything, dodging the question makes people suspicious that there’s something to hide. Surely the safest strategy is to release that bit of information, which is nothing compared to the flood of data which has been released about his health, and stop any further speculation.

as if you somehow are entitled

On Oct 10, 2020, landmark wrote:

Quote:

as if you somehow are entitled

You are very confused.
I help to pay the man's salary. He wants to return to work and there's no assurance he is not still infected.
He may have infected up to 34 of the people whose salaries I also help to pay.
Of course I have the right to know whether my employee is attempting to come back to work with a contagious disease!
I have to pay for his helicopter, doctors, Regeneron, etc.
I have a total right to know whether he is physically fit and able to do the job; or for that matter to resume the job in January.
What are you thinking? This isn't the Sun King.

On Oct 10, 2020, landmark wrote:

Quote:

as if you somehow are entitled

You are very confused.
I help to pay the man's salary. He wants to return to work and there's no assurance he is not still infected.
He may have infected up to 34 of the people whose salaries I also help to pay.
Of course I have the right to know whether my employee is attempting to come back to work with a contagious disease!
I have to pay for his helicopter, doctors, Regeneron, etc.
I have a total right to know whether he is physically fit and able to do the job; or for that matter to resume the job in January.
What are you thinking? This isn't the Sun King.

On Oct 11, 2020, TomBoleware wrote:

Quote:

On Oct 10, 2020, landmark wrote:

Quote:

as if you somehow are entitled

You are very confused.
I help to pay the man's salary. He wants to return to work and there's no assurance he is not still infected.
He may have infected up to 34 of the people whose salaries I also help to pay.
Of course I have the right to know whether my employee is attempting to come back to work with a contagious disease!
I have to pay for his helicopter, doctors, Regeneron, etc.
I have a total right to know whether he is physically fit and able to do the job; or for that matter to resume the job in January.
What are you thinking? This isn't the Sun King.

I have rights too. I say leave him there to do his job I hired him to do, so why should your rights be demanded over my rights?

Maybe we should just vote on it again.

Tom

On Oct 11, 2020, magicalaurie wrote:
There's this, too:

https://www.closerweekly.com/posts/does-......-156689/

Seems a bit of a mess. Hence my position on the dollar.
And politics.

*"wabout" should read "what about".

On Oct 7, 2020, tommy wrote:
Of course, you do live in a monarchy: your monarch being your Constitution, that which you swear your allegiance, that which can do no wrong. We the people including the president are subjects and can do wrong and so on. Your monarch is called a legal fiction which better than a living monarch because one can get good and bad kings and queens as time goes by but the Constitution is good by design and remains so down through the ages. We the people of the USA can vote out bad presidents every few years but long live the king/constitution. Not that I am an expert but that is my understanding of how it is.

Incidently I agree with Danny about the press; I have never seen anything like it in my life. Even here in England there has been an all out constant propaganda attack against Trump and I am not a fan of Trump or any other politician actually.

On Oct 7, 2020, Jonathan Townsend wrote:

Quote:

On Oct 7, 2020, landmark wrote:

Quote:

On Oct 7, 2020, Dannydoyle wrote:
...
They are the nature vidiographers who do not film the lions eating the Zebra, but rather they help the Zebra escape or help the lion catch the zebra. Either way it is disgusting agenda driven drivel.

Nope, not buying the "both sides" argument in this case. The events of the past week are solely, exclusively on the President, events which very likely could have been avoided. Luck of course is a factor, but luck favors the prepared, and disfavors the unprepared or reckless.

Making a film is not the same as catching an event on film. See Disney about lemmings.

Infotainment delivers customers to advertisers. Don't touch that dial!

Donald Trump taking off his mask made and interesting photo opp. Time will tell.

* Different channels for different folks; mostly swimming the same strokes.

On Oct 11, 2020, TomBoleware wrote:

Quote:

On Oct 10, 2020, landmark wrote:

Quote:

as if you somehow are entitled

You are very confused.
I help to pay the man's salary. He wants to return to work and there's no assurance he is not still infected.
He may have infected up to 34 of the people whose salaries I also help to pay.
Of course I have the right to know whether my employee is attempting to come back to work with a contagious disease!
I have to pay for his helicopter, doctors, Regeneron, etc.
I have a total right to know whether he is physically fit and able to do the job; or for that matter to resume the job in January.
What are you thinking? This isn't the Sun King.

I have rights too. I say leave him there to do his job I hired him to do, so why should your rights be demanded over my rights?

Maybe we should just vote on it again.

Tom