|
|
|||
| Go to page [Previous] 1~2~3..7..11..15..19..20~21~22~23~24..33..41..49..57..63~64~65 [Next] | ||||||||||
|
Sudo Nimh Inner circle 1910 Posts
|
Just because one has friends who are "giants" in the industry doesn't mean those friends know and have seen everything. I remember performing a fairly obscure effect in Jeff McBride's living room before him, Eugene Burger, Lance Burton, and Mac King. Not only did none of them have a clue as to how it was accomplished, none of them knew where it came from. The funny part, is that Jeff had the book which featured the effect sitting in his library!
Converting the numbers 51, 6, and 500 to Roman numerals makes me LIVID!
|
|||||||||
|
Mac_Stone Inner circle Miami, FL 1523 Posts
|
You guys are conflating a number of issues for your own connivence.
Yes, Magic Age Cards is an age old principle, one of the oldest in magic. Taking this principle and applying to to receipts however was indisputably first published and released to market, albeit very limitedly, by Michael Weber. Some of you seem to still be in denial of this very simple fact and have even fabricated out of whole cloth vast conspiracies and networks of various nefarious actors all designed to take down Craig Petty, a laughably amusing fantasy. Further, I suspect the vast majority of purchasers will end up disappointed with this release and that most of the seven hours of content Craig keeps touting will be filler material. However, that's only my opinion. That Michael Weber came up with and published this same idea first is a matter of fact, whether or not any of you choose to believe it. It certainly seems Craig chose not to believe it and now we've ended up where we are. |
|||||||||
|
Sudo Nimh Inner circle 1910 Posts
|
Quote:
On Feb 6, 2023, Mac_Stone wrote: A limited subscription-based model is not the same as "to market". Do you disagree that the way they handled Craig wasn't even remotely fair?
Converting the numbers 51, 6, and 500 to Roman numerals makes me LIVID!
|
|||||||||
|
sileeni Veteran user UK. 366 Posts
|
Quote:
On Feb 6, 2023, Mac_Stone wrote: YES! So glad you're back, "Mac." Thought you'd decided to skip town with Weber after he gave up the ghost. Rememeber... the internet never forgets
|
|||||||||
|
influentialist Special user 511 Posts
|
We have now now reached peak "If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?"
|
|||||||||
|
Sudo Nimh Inner circle 1910 Posts
|
Quote:
On Feb 6, 2023, influentialist wrote: Agreed. At this point, things are just going in circles.
Converting the numbers 51, 6, and 500 to Roman numerals makes me LIVID!
|
|||||||||
|
Mac_Stone Inner circle Miami, FL 1523 Posts
|
Quote:
On Feb 6, 2023, Sudo Nimh wrote: Based on Craig's version of events? Yes, I do. He reads off a few choice excerpts from what are probably MANY email exchanges back and forth and that is somehow supposed to represent a whole, complete, and truthful recounting of events? Craig obviously has an incentive to- as he puts it, "control the narrative," in a way that suits him. Arguably the other guys have the exact same incentive. I'm not here to argue about any of that, I never have, only to state the clear and simple fact the other guys did it first. The fact that Craig was unaware of this is forgivable, Weber even says as much in his first email and goes so far as to compliment Craig on coming up with a great idea, an easy compliment to give as Weber came up with it first. Craig immediately and defensively responds from a position that Weber has fabricated a story in order to prevent Craig from moving forward with his project, undoubtedly because he still holds a grudge over the Red fiasco. Craig has a very well documented history, that he himself has published on youtube, spanning over a decade of him drumming up controversy for his own benefit. It may be cynical, but it's very hard for me to separate Craig's history from this current situation. |
|||||||||
|
Intrepid Inner circle Silver Spring, MD 1281 Posts
|
Quote:
On Feb 6, 2023, Mac_Stone wrote: Drop the bs
Bob
|
|||||||||
|
da5id Loyal user Dublin, Ireland 268 Posts
|
Quote:
On Feb 6, 2023, Mac_Stone wrote: So limited as to be useless in due diligence. That’s the main point. |
|||||||||
|
Mac_Stone Inner circle Miami, FL 1523 Posts
|
Quote:
On Feb 6, 2023, Intrepid wrote: Elaborate. |
|||||||||
|
Mac_Stone Inner circle Miami, FL 1523 Posts
|
Quote:
On Feb 6, 2023, da5id wrote: You missed this point: Quote:
The fact that Craig was unaware of this is forgivable, Weber even says as much in his first email and goes so far as to compliment Craig on coming up with a great idea, an easy compliment to give as Weber came up with it first. Craig immediately and defensively responds from a position that Weber has fabricated a story in order to prevent Craig from moving forward with his project, undoubtedly because he still holds a grudge over the Red fiasco. |
|||||||||
|
da5id Loyal user Dublin, Ireland 268 Posts
|
Quote:
On Feb 6, 2023, Mac_Stone wrote: Weber didn’t ask for a credit, Tim. |
|||||||||
|
TStone V.I.P. Stockholm, Sweden 825 Posts
|
Quote:
On Feb 6, 2023, Mac_Stone wrote: I wish it was that simple. I can't really figure out the reasoning behind it, but the people behind Real Secrets put a huge effort into obfuscating the crediting in their releases. People here, and at the Conjuring Archive, seems convinced that RealSecrets = Weber and Trono. And even if that seems plausible, I have actually never seen it explicitly stated anywhere. Nor have I seen anything that says that the team consisted of only those two people... the crediting seems to hint that RealSecrets were more than those two. If we look at the "Age Receipts", this is the whole crediting in total: Quote:
Background: Maven, Trono, Weber, Heath, Becker, Gardner. This version developed by Real Secrets From this, I can't figure out who contributed what. Max Maven obviously contributed the reverse coding from Racer's Edge (Violet book of mentalism). I thought that I was first in combining Max's reverse coding with marked backs when I published The Test in 2003, but since my name isn't included, I guess one of the other names preceeded me. It would be very interesting to look that up, but the crediting gives me no clue on where to look. Do it make sense to name their own names in the "Background", but not in "This version developed by...", if no one else was involved in the creation? I have no idea. Frankly, if someone asked me to design a project with the explicit purpose of causing future crediting conflicts, I wouldn't be able to come up with anything that would surpass Real Secrets. The gut feeling is that, yes, Weber is behind "Age Receipts" because it feels very Weber-esque. But I would much rather have had it in print in the original publication, because I don't like having to rely on gut feelings when inserting myself in crediting conflicts. |
|||||||||
|
Sudo Nimh Inner circle 1910 Posts
|
I can see your perspective somewhat. Like you, I don't know how many emails were exchanged and what parts may have been omitted etc. And I do think that, in fairness, if someone is going to discuss the contents of an email exchange, then perhaps the entirety of them should be shared for the sake of full transparency.
But also in fairness, what Michael was doing here with his comments about Craig on the thread under an alias was also shady. I don't understand why there couldn't have been some sort of amicable negotiation instead. As I stated before, Craig could have offered a cut from sales and crediting to Michael and he (Michael) would literally be making free money from a project that he didn't even have to sink a dime into. It's a win/win situation for everyone. Why there wasn't any negotiation at all is what puzzles me. I do believe Craig when he says he had no prior knowledge of Michael's routine and it is unreasonable to expect Craig to pull the plug on it after investing all the money it costs to produce everything. This solution just seems to make perfect sense. Is it just about the money? Is that all this really boils down to? If so, that makes me so sad.
Converting the numbers 51, 6, and 500 to Roman numerals makes me LIVID!
|
|||||||||
|
da5id Loyal user Dublin, Ireland 268 Posts
|
Here is how we know Weber didn’t ask for a credit.
Quote:
On Feb 3, 2023, newguy wrote: |
|||||||||
|
mralincoln Loyal user If I wasn't so busy, I'd have more than 210 Posts
|
Without getting into the Petty/Weber debate specifics, based on some of the arguments being made here (related to limited subscription releases not being “public”), it sounds as if some believe one could subscribe to Craig Petty’s Netflix or Lloyd Barnes’ Secret Society or Christian Grace’s Magic Monthly, learn any of the secrets/effects offered, and market (sell) those effects and/or their “improvements “ as their own.
|
|||||||||
|
Mr. Dural Loyal user 274 Posts
|
The issue stems from the way things where handled. Weber was using his clout to snuff out Craig's release basically demanding he cease the project. Surprised Craig didn't wake up with his favorite balloon animal's head in his bed with a note "Don Weber says hello".
All that was required was for Michael to say " Hey Craig, this effect you're about to put out - I did the same idea in Real Secrets, a subscription that you don't have access to, and the contents of which are not public knowledge because its like Fight-club. I would like to discuss crediting, and see how you have advanced the plot to merit a release." Weber ruined his reputation, and marred his previous work with his heavy handed tactics - and for what ? A presentation of a method that is ancient. As for the supposed internet persona's, new guy, deception guy, guy ..wait isn't he supposed to be a creative genius ? Guess that doesn't extend to forum names - lolz. As for Peter Turner - I think he is a good guy with a clean heart, and would be very surprised if he lowered himself or instructed his "pals" to bully. I have seen pal Jakob lose it on this forum more than once though. |
|||||||||
|
da5id Loyal user Dublin, Ireland 268 Posts
|
Quote:
On Feb 6, 2023, mralincoln wrote: False equivalence. The effects on netrix are not a secret. Only the method. |
|||||||||
|
Mac_Stone Inner circle Miami, FL 1523 Posts
|
Tom,
Fair enough. However, given that Age Receipts was then later reworked and republished under the title Storage as part of The Works ©2018 Michael Weber I think we can safely leave your gut at ease. |
|||||||||
|
The Mac Inner circle 1983 Posts
|
![]() |
|||||||||
| The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Latest and Greatest? » » EDCeipt by Craig Petty - BRAND NEW » » TOPIC IS LOCKED (2348 Likes) | ||||||||||
| Go to page [Previous] 1~2~3..7..11..15..19..20~21~22~23~24..33..41..49..57..63~64~65 [Next] | ||||||||||
| [ Top of Page ] |
|
All content & postings Copyright © 2001-2026 Steve Brooks. All Rights Reserved. This page was created in 0.04 seconds requiring 5 database queries. |
|
The views and comments expressed on The Magic Café are not necessarily those of The Magic Café, Steve Brooks, or Steve Brooks Magic. > Privacy Statement <
![]() |